Truck Comparison

Arzoo Eco 22 vs Avon E-Rick 207 Butterfly vs Bahubali E-Rickshaw Bahubali vs E-Maggic S.S: Price & Specs Comparison

Arzoo Eco 22 leads on power at 2 HP. The compared trucks cover E Rickshaw body type with Electric fuel option.

This comparison uses the available truck data for Arzoo Eco 22 vs Avon E-Rick 207 Butterfly vs Bahubali E-Rickshaw Bahubali vs E-Maggic S.S so you can check which model fits better for your budget, route, payload requirement, fuel preference, and daily business usage.

Body type: E Rickshaw. Fuel option: Electric. Tyres: 3. Payload: Arzoo Eco 22: NA | Avon E-Rick 207 Butterfly: NA | Bahubali E-Rickshaw Bahubali: NA | E-Maggic S.S: NA.

Review all available price, mileage, power, torque, GVW, body type, tyres, gearbox, chassis, and extra specification details below before shortlisting a model.

Compare

Add Trucks to Compare

Details

Full Truck Details

Specs

This TruckArzoo Eco 22

₹1.35 L

Avon E-Rick 207 Butterfly

₹1.35 L

Bahubali E-Rickshaw Bahubali

₹1.35 L

E-Maggic S.S

₹1.37 L

Key Specifications16 specs

Price

₹1.35 L

₹1.37 L

Brand

arzoo

avon

bahubali

e-maggic

Model

Arzoo Eco 22

Avon E-Rick 207 Butterfly

Bahubali E-Rickshaw Bahubali

E-Maggic S.S

Body Type

E Rickshaw

Engine

Power

2 hp

1 hp

Max Torque

Mileage

110 km/Per Charge

80-100 km

70-100 km/full charge

80 KM

Gross Vehicle Weight

600 kg

400 kg

717 kg

Payload

No. of Tyres

Fuel Type

Electric

Fuel Tank Capacity

140 Ah

110 Ah

140 Ah

80 Ah

Max Speed

40 Km/h

24 Km/h

25 Km/h

25 km/h

Gear Box

1 Forward + 1 Reverse

Chassis Type

Chassis with Cabin

Strong Chasis

Chassis with Cabin

Performance13 specs

Max Power

2 hp

1 hp

Fuel Type

Electric

Max Speed (km/h)

Range

110

70-100

Battery Capacity

140 Ah

80 Ah

Type of Motor

BLDC Motor

Brushless Motor

Brushless Dc Motor

Product Type

L3M (Low Speed Passenger Carrier)

Carrier Type

Passenger Carrier

Emission Norms

Zero Tailpipe

Top Speed

Gradeability (%)

20 %

Turning Radius (mm)

4034

Motor Capacity

1200 W

Charging1 specs

Charging Time

6-8 hrs

7-8 Hours

7-10 Hours

7-8 Hours

Dimension6 specs

Overall Length (mm)

2400

2740

2782

Overall Width (mm)

1000

1300

990

995

Overall Height (mm)

1700

1800

1740

1775

Ground Clearance (mm)

180

200

160

Axle Configuration

3x3

Wheelbase (mm)

2050

2170

Transmission & Loading Capacity6 specs

Transmission

Automatic

GVW / GCW (Kgs)

600 kg

400 kg

717 kg

Gear Box

1 Forward + 1 Reverse

Power Steering

Kerb Weight (Kgs)

500

203

337

Clutch

43 mm dia Hydrolic

Features14 specs

Steering

Handle bar type

A/C

Cruise Control

Navigation System

Telematics

Tiltable Steering

Arm-rest

Seat Type

Standard

Driver Information Display

Adjustable Driver Seat

Seating Capacity

D+4 Passenger

Tubeless Tyres

Seat Belts

Hill Hold

Brakes & Suspension5 specs

Brakes

Drum Brakes

Drum Brake

Drum Brakes

Mechanical drum brake

Front Suspension

Telescopic Shockers

Telescopic Suspension

Hydraulic / Telescopic Shoker

Leaf spring suspension

Rear Suspension

Leaf Spring

Leaf Spring Suspension

Leaf spring / Telescopic Shocker

Leaf Spring Suspension

ABS

Parking Brakes

Body Option & Cabin Type4 specs

Chassis Type

Chassis with Cabin

Strong Chasis

Chassis with Cabin

Body Option

Fully Built

Cabin Type

Day Cabin

Tiltable Cabin

Tyres3 specs

Number of Tyre

Rear Tyre

3.75-12

3x75-12

90 x 90 x 12 (3.75 x 12)

Front Tyre

3.75-12

3x75-12

90 x 90 x 12 (3.75 x 12)

Others5 specs

Chassis

Battery(Volts)

48 V

12 V

48 V

Alternator (Amps)

Fog Lights

Loading Platform Area(Sq.ft)

20.18

Other Details4 specs

Charging Time

6-8 Hours

7-8 Hours

7-10 Hours

7-8 Hours

Type Of Motor

BLDC Motor

Electric Motor

Brushless Motor

Brushless Dc Motor

Rating

4.5

4.7

Usecase

Transport

Bulk cargo movement

Passenger Carrier, Goods transport, Feeder service, Short-distance commute, Shared rides

Intercity transport of goods

Which to buy

Which One Fits Your Use Case?

Arzoo Eco 22

Best for:

Transport

Avon E-Rick 207 Butterfly

Best for:

Bulk cargo movement

Bahubali E-Rickshaw Bahubali

Best for:

Passenger Carrier
Goods transport
Feeder service
Short-distance commute

E-Maggic S.S

Best for:

Intercity transport of goods

FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has better power, Arzoo Eco 22 vs Avon E-Rick 207 Butterfly vs Bahubali E-Rickshaw Bahubali vs E-Maggic S.S?

Arzoo Eco 22 has the better power at 2 HP.

Which has better mileage, Arzoo Eco 22 vs Avon E-Rick 207 Butterfly vs Bahubali E-Rickshaw Bahubali vs E-Maggic S.S?

Arzoo Eco 22 has the better mileage at 110 km/l.

Which has better GVW, Arzoo Eco 22 vs Avon E-Rick 207 Butterfly vs Bahubali E-Rickshaw Bahubali vs E-Maggic S.S?

E-Maggic S.S has the better GVW at 717 kg.

Which truck should I choose between Arzoo Eco 22 and Avon E-Rick 207 Butterfly?

Choose Arzoo Eco 22 if its price, body type, fuel type, and payload fit your route and loading needs better. Choose Avon E-Rick 207 Butterfly if its specifications, service fit, or operating cost suits your business use case more closely.

What fuel types are available in Arzoo Eco 22 vs Avon E-Rick 207 Butterfly vs Bahubali E-Rickshaw Bahubali vs E-Maggic S.S?

Arzoo Eco 22 vs Avon E-Rick 207 Butterfly vs Bahubali E-Rickshaw Bahubali vs E-Maggic S.S include Electric fuel option. Buyers should compare fuel availability, route distance, and daily running cost before finalizing a truck.

What body types are compared in Arzoo Eco 22 vs Avon E-Rick 207 Butterfly vs Bahubali E-Rickshaw Bahubali vs E-Maggic S.S?

This comparison includes E Rickshaw body type. Match the body type with your cargo, loading pattern, and city or highway route requirement.

How do tyre configurations compare in Arzoo Eco 22 vs Avon E-Rick 207 Butterfly vs Bahubali E-Rickshaw Bahubali vs E-Maggic S.S?

Arzoo Eco 22 has 3 tyres, Avon E-Rick 207 Butterfly has 3 tyres, Bahubali E-Rickshaw Bahubali has 3 tyres, E-Maggic S.S has 3 tyres. Tyre configuration matters for load stability, operating conditions, and maintenance planning.