Atul Gemini Passenger vs Atul Rik vs Atul RIK CUB vs Eko Tejas Metro-101 vs Piaggio Ape Auto Plus vs Piaggio Ape City Metro: Price & Specs Comparison
By TruckOnWheels Editorial Team · Last updated 29 Jan 2026
Eko Tejas Metro-101 is the more affordable option here by about ₹25,000. Eko Tejas Metro-101 leads on mileage at 80 km/l.
 Atul Gemini Passenger ₹2.15 Lakh |  Atul Rik ₹1.94 Lakh - ₹2.00 Lakh |  Atul RIK CUB ₹1.95 Lakh - ₹2.00 Lakh |  Eko Tejas Metro-101 ₹1.75 Lakh |  Piaggio Ape Auto Plus ₹2.07 Lakh |  Piaggio Ape City Metro ₹2.22 Lakh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | ₹2.15 Lakh | ₹1.94 Lakh - ₹2.00 Lakh | ₹1.95 Lakh - ₹2.00 Lakh | ₹1.75 Lakh | ₹2.07 Lakh | ₹2.22 Lakh |
| Body Type | Auto Rickshaw | Auto Rickshaw | Auto Rickshaw | Auto Rickshaw | Auto Rickshaw | Auto Rickshaw |
| Engine | 198.6 cc | 200 cc | 198.6 cc | NA | 597 cc | 230 cc |
| Power | 7 hp | 9.59 hp | 9.86 hp | 1 hp | 7 Kw | 6.90 kW |
| Max Torque | 11.70 Nm Nm | 14.22 Nm Nm | 14.7 Nm Nm | NA Nm | 23.93 Nm Nm | 16.30 Nm Nm |
| Mileage | 25 kmpl | 25 kmpl | 25 kmpl | 80-120 | 25 kmpl | 45 Kmpl |
| Gross Vehicle Weight | 688 kg | 727 kg | 748 kg | 590 kg | 968 kg | 780 kg |
| Payload | 500 Kgs | NA | No | NA | NA | NA |
| No. of Tyres | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Fuel Type | CNG | LPG | CNG | Electric | Diesel | CNG |
| Gear Box | 4 Forward + 1 Reverse | 4 Forward + 1 Reverse | 4 Forward + 1 Reverse | 1 Forward + 1 Reverse | 5 Forward, 1 Reverse | 4 Forward + 1 Reverse ,Consent Mesh |
| Chassis Type | Chassis with Cabin | Chassis with Cabin | Chassis with Cabin | Chassis with Cabin | Chassis with Cabin | Chassis with Cabin |
You can compare up to 6 trucks at a time.
Review
Pros & Cons
Atul Gemini Passenger
Pros
- Economical to purchase and operate
- High fuel efficiency suitable for daily commutes
- Excellent maneuverability in crowded urban environments
Cons
- Limited passenger carrying capacity
- Basic comfort levels especially for longer routes
- Not suitable for high speed or long distance travel
Atul Rik
Pros
- The name 'Atul' is familiar and recognized in India, potentially leveraging existing brand recall or trust if associated with the Atul Auto brand.
- The meaning of 'Atul' is 'incomparable' or 'unique,' which conveys a strong and positive brand message.
- The 'Rik' component, resembling 'rickshaw,' could suggest agility and maneuverability, appealing to the market for light commercial or mini-trucks.
Cons
- There is a high risk of brand confusion with 'Atul Auto,' an established Indian manufacturer of three-wheelers, potentially diluting brand identity or causing market overlap.
- The 'Rik' element strongly associates the vehicle with light commercial vehicles or three-wheelers, which might undermine the perceived strength and capacity if it is intended to be a medium or heavy-duty truck.
- The name might not convey the ruggedness or power typically associated with larger trucks, potentially limiting its appeal in certain segments.
Atul RIK CUB
Pros
- Atul carries a positive meaning of being unmatched or incomparable in Hindi.
- The inclusion of Cub clearly suggests a compact or agile vehicle, fitting for a smaller utility truck.
- Rik could be a unique and memorable element of the name.
Cons
- Atul is a common personal name which might detract from a vehicle's identity.
- Rik is an ambiguous term and does not clearly convey power or utility for a truck.
- Cub might imply a lack of heavy-duty capability or make the vehicle sound less serious.
Eko Tejas Metro-101
Pros
- The Eko Tejas Metro 101 truly shines with its class-leading fuel efficiency, delivering an impressive 35 km/kg for the CNG variant and up to 32 km/l for the Diesel model, significantly cutting down operational costs for Indian truck buyers.
- With readily available Diesel, Petrol, and CNG variants, the Eko Tejas Metro 101 offers unparalleled flexibility, allowing owners to choose the most cost-effective and suitable fuel type based on regional availability and specific business needs.
- Designed for urban logistics, this compact mini-truck boasts an incredibly tight turning radius and small footprint, making the Eko Tejas Metro 101 effortlessly navigable through congested city streets and narrow alleys.
Cons
- While efficient, the engine of the Eko Tejas Metro 101 might feel a bit underpowered when tackling steep inclines or continuously hauling its maximum rated payload over longer distances, potentially impacting average trip times.
- The utilitarian interior focuses purely on functionality, lacking modern amenities like air conditioning, advanced infotainment, or ergonomic seating adjustments, which could lead to driver fatigue during extended periods behind the wheel.
- Primarily engineered for short-haul urban and semi-urban routes, the Eko Tejas Metro 101 may not offer the same stability, top speed, or comfortable ride quality required for frequent highway operations or long-distance inter-city transport.
Piaggio Ape Auto Plus
Pros
- Affordable initial purchase cost
- Excellent fuel efficiency
- Low maintenance requirements
Cons
- Limited carrying capacity compared to larger trucks
- Lower top speed not suitable for highways
- Basic comfort features for the driver and passengers
Piaggio Ape City Metro
Pros
- Compact dimensions allow for easy maneuverability in congested city streets
- Exceptional fuel efficiency helps reduce operational costs for businesses
- Low initial purchase price makes it accessible for small entrepreneurs
Cons
- Limited cargo carrying capacity restricts the size and weight of goods
- Low top speed makes it unsuitable for highway travel or long distances
- Basic safety features offer minimal protection in case of an accident
Which to buy
Which One Fits Your Use Case?
FAQs
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, Atul Gemini Passenger vs Atul Rik vs Atul RIK CUB vs Eko Tejas Metro-101 vs Piaggio Ape Auto Plus vs Piaggio Ape City Metro?
+−
Eko Tejas Metro-101 has the lower price among these options.
Which has better power, Atul Gemini Passenger vs Atul Rik vs Atul RIK CUB vs Eko Tejas Metro-101 vs Piaggio Ape Auto Plus vs Piaggio Ape City Metro?
+−
Atul RIK CUB has the better power at 9.86 HP.
Which has better mileage, Atul Gemini Passenger vs Atul Rik vs Atul RIK CUB vs Eko Tejas Metro-101 vs Piaggio Ape Auto Plus vs Piaggio Ape City Metro?
+−
Eko Tejas Metro-101 has the better mileage at 80 km/l.
What is the ex-showroom price of the Atul Gemini Passenger in India?
+−
The ex-showroom price of the Atul Gemini Passenger in India typically varies based on the city and specific variant (e.g., Petrol, Diesel, CNG). It's generally in an affordable range, making it accessible for new entrepreneurs. You can check the latest prices on the official website or at your nearest dealership.
What is the typical truck price in India for a small commercial vehicle (SCV)?
+−
The typical truck price in India for a small commercial vehicle (SCV) generally ranges from ₹4 lakhs to ₹10 lakhs, depending on the brand, features, and payload capacity. These compact yet powerful vehicles offer an excellent entry point for many businesses. You can find various options at competitive prices on TruckOnWheels.
What is the general price range for small commercial vehicles in India?
+−
The price range for small commercial vehicles in India typically starts from around ₹4.5 lakhs and can go up to ₹10-12 lakhs, depending on the brand, features, and payload capacity. This makes them accessible for many businesses.
What is the ex-showroom price of the Eko Tejas Metro 101 in India?
+−
The ex-showroom price of the Eko Tejas Metro 101 starts from approximately ₹11.5 Lakhs in India, offering excellent value for a truck in its 6.5-ton GVW segment.
What is the approximate on-road price of the Piaggio Ape Auto Plus in India?
+−
The on-road price typically ranges from Rs 2.5 lakh to Rs 3.5 lakh, varying by city, fuel type, and specific variant chosen.
What is the approximate on-road price of the Piaggio Ape City Metro in India?
+−
The on-road price for the Piaggio Ape City Metro typically ranges from approximately Rs 2.5 lakh to Rs 3.5 lakh, varying by city, fuel type, and specific variant chosen.