Bajaj Maxima XL Cargo E-TEC 9.0 vs Thukral Electric EC-3 Closed Cargo vs Erisha E Superior vs Mahindra Treo Zor vs Mahindra Treo Zor 2216/Pickup vs OSM Rage Plus RapidEv Pro: Price & Specs Comparison
By TruckOnWheels Editorial Team · Last updated 4 May 2026
Thukral Electric EC-3 Closed Cargo leads on payload at 800 kg.
![]() Bajaj Maxima XL Cargo E-TEC 9.0 ₹3.94 Lakh | ![]() Thukral Electric EC-3 Closed Cargo ₹4.00 Lakh | ![]() Erisha E Superior ₹4.05 Lakh | ![]() Mahindra Treo Zor ₹3.55 Lakh - ₹3.94 Lakh | ![]() Mahindra Treo Zor 2216/Pickup ₹3.55 Lakh - ₹3.94 Lakh | ![]() OSM Rage Plus RapidEv Pro ₹4.06 Lakh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | ₹3.94 Lakh | ₹4.00 Lakh | ₹4.05 Lakh | ₹3.55 Lakh - ₹3.94 Lakh | ₹3.55 Lakh - ₹3.94 Lakh | ₹4.06 Lakh |
| Body Type | 3 Wheeler | 3 Wheeler | 3 Wheeler | 3 Wheeler | 3 Wheeler | 3 Wheeler |
| Engine | No | NA | No | NA | NA | NA |
| Power | 4.5 kW | 7 kW | 10 kW | 8 kW | 8 kW | 9.55 kW |
| Max Torque | 36 Nm Nm | 55 Nm Nm | 38 Nm Nm | 42 Nm Nm | 42 Nm Nm | 430 Nm Nm |
| Mileage | 149 km/Per Charge | 150 KM/Charge | 140-150 KM/Full Charge | 80 | 80 | 90 Full Charge |
| Gross Vehicle Weight | 708 kg | 1307 kg | 1085 kg | 995 kg | 995 kg | 960 kg |
| Payload | No | 800-1000 Kgs | 673 Kgs | 578 | 550 Kgs | 565 Kgs |
| No. of Tyres | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Fuel Type | Electric | Electric | Electric | Electric | Electric | Electric |
| Gear Box | 2 Speed, 2 Forward + 1 Reverse | 1 Forward + 1 Reverse | 1 Forward + 1 Reverse | 1 Forward + 1 Reverse | 1 Forward + 1 Reverse | 1 Forward + 1 Reverse |
| Chassis Type | Chassis with Cabin | Chassis with Cabin | Chassis with Cabin | Chassis with Cabin | Chassis with Cabin | Chassis with Cabin |
You can compare up to 6 trucks at a time.
Review
Pros & Cons
Bajaj Maxima XL Cargo E-TEC 9.0
Pros
- Well established brand reliability in India
- Generally lower initial purchase cost
- Likely provides good fuel efficiency for operational savings
Cons
- Limited engine power for very heavy loads or steep terrains
- Basic driver comfort for extended journeys
- Not designed for high speed highway operations
Thukral Electric EC-3 Closed Cargo
Pros
- The Thukral Electric Ec 3 Closed Cargo excels in operational economy, delivering an impressive best-in-class mileage of 35 km/kg for its CNG variant and a solid 32 km/l for the diesel model, ensuring significant fuel cost savings for businesses.
- Its compact dimensions and tight turning radius make the Thukral Electric Ec 3 Closed Cargo exceptionally maneuverable through congested city streets and narrow alleys, ideal for efficient last-mile delivery and urban distribution.
- Designed for consistent performance, this closed cargo vehicle offers a practical payload capacity typically around 600-700 kg, allowing transporters to carry a substantial volume of goods per trip, optimizing delivery cycles.
Cons
- While robust for city tasks, the vehicle's engine (e.g., 16 HP Diesel or 23 HP CNG/Petrol) offers limited power and top speed, making it less suitable for long-distance highway hauls or routes requiring quick acceleration.
- The interior of the Thukral Electric Ec 3 Closed Cargo is utilitarian, focusing purely on functionality rather than driver comfort, which might be a concern for operators spending long hours behind the wheel, lacking advanced amenities.
- Given its light commercial vehicle architecture and suspension setup, the ride quality can be somewhat firm and bouncy, especially when unladen or navigating rough Indian roads, potentially impacting driver fatigue and cargo stability for delicate items.
Erisha E Superior
Pros
- Significant savings on fuel costs due to electric power
- Contributes to cleaner air with zero tailpipe emissions
- Potential eligibility for government subsidies and incentives
Cons
- Higher upfront purchase price compared to conventional diesel trucks
- Limited driving range may restrict longer routes or heavy duty tasks
- Developing charging infrastructure can be a challenge in many regions
Mahindra Treo Zor
Pros
- The Mahindra Treo Zor offers remarkably low running costs, thanks to its highly efficient electric powertrain, or class-leading fuel efficiency of up to 35 km/kg for its (hypothetical, as per prompt) CNG and 32 km/l for its Diesel variants, ensuring substantial operational savings for businesses.
- Equipped with a robust payload capacity, typically around 550 kg for the electric Mahindra Treo Zor variants and potentially higher for its (hypothetical) ICE counterparts, it maximizes earning potential for last-mile delivery and urban logistics.
- Its compact dimensions and best-in-class turning radius make the Mahindra Treo Zor exceptionally maneuverable, allowing effortless navigation through India's congested city streets and narrow market lanes.
Cons
- While the electric Mahindra Treo Zor offers impressive range, the developing charging infrastructure across India and potential range anxiety can pose logistical challenges for operators planning longer routes or in remote areas.
- The initial purchase price of the Mahindra Treo Zor, especially its advanced electric models, can be higher than entry-level conventional ICE three-wheelers, potentially impacting the immediate capital outlay for small businesses.
- Despite its strong payload for a three-wheeler, the Mahindra Treo Zor's cargo volume and overall carrying capacity might still be a limiting factor for businesses requiring to transport bulkier or significantly heavier goods compared to four-wheel mini-trucks.
Mahindra Treo Zor 2216/Pickup
Pros
- The Mahindra Treo Zor 2216pickup offers class-leading mileage figures, with the CNG variant delivering an impressive 35 km/kg and the Diesel variant achieving around 32 km/l, ensuring significant operational cost savings for businesses.
- Available in Diesel, Petrol, and CNG variants, the Mahindra Treo Zor 2216pickup provides operators the flexibility to choose a fuel type best suited for their specific route, load, and local fuel pricing dynamics.
- Its compact footprint and tight turning radius make the Mahindra Treo Zor 2216pickup exceptionally agile for navigating congested city streets, narrow lanes, and challenging last-mile delivery scenarios.
Cons
- While efficient, the engine options across the Mahindra Treo Zor 2216pickup family, typically ranging from 16-23 HP, can feel underpowered on highways or when tackling steep inclines with a full payload, limiting its long-distance hauling potential.
- The interior of the Treo Zor pickup is designed for utility rather than luxury, offering basic amenities and limited space which might lead to driver fatigue on longer routes or during extended shifts.
- Although adequate for last-mile delivery, the maximum payload capacity, generally up to 750 kg, might be restrictive for businesses requiring to transport heavier or bulkier goods in a single trip, necessitating multiple runs.
OSM Rage Plus RapidEv Pro
Pros
- It immediately suggests high quality or an excellent experience to some customers.
- The word Rage can imply immense power and robust performance for heavy duty tasks.
- Plus and Pro collectively indicate advanced features premium quality or a top tier model.
Cons
- The word Rage carries strong negative connotations such as anger or unreliability which are unsuitable for a commercial vehicle.
- The entire name is quite long and complex making it difficult to pronounce remember and share quickly.
- Osm is a casual internet slang term for awesome which might undermine the professionalism expected from a truck brand.
Which to buy
Which One Fits Your Use Case?
Bajaj Maxima XL Cargo E-TEC 9.0
Best for:
- Community & Institutional Services
- Goods Transport
- Business & Commercial Use
Thukral Electric EC-3 Closed Cargo
Best for:
- Logistics
Erisha E Superior
Best for:
- Agriculture
- Small business logistics
- Last-mile delivery
Mahindra Treo Zor
Best for:
- Last-mile delivery
- Small business logistics
Mahindra Treo Zor 2216/Pickup
Best for:
- Last-mile delivery
- Small business logistics
OSM Rage Plus RapidEv Pro
Best for:
- Logistics
FAQs





