Truck Comparison
Force Traveller N Delivery Van 4020WB/Wider Body vs Euler Motors Turbo EV 1000 vs Evage Motors FR8 vs Hexall Mammoth HOP: Price & Specs Comparison
Euler Motors Turbo EV 1000 is the more affordable option here by about ₹7,65,000. Force Traveller N Delivery Van 4020WB/Wider Body leads on power at 114 HP. The compared trucks cover 4 Wheeler body type with Diesel, Electric fuel options.
This comparison uses the available truck data for Force Traveller N Delivery Van 4020WB/Wider Body vs Euler Motors Turbo EV 1000 vs Evage Motors FR8 vs Hexall Mammoth HOP so you can check which model fits better for your budget, route, payload requirement, fuel preference, and daily business usage.
Body type: 4 Wheeler. Fuel options: Diesel, Electric. Tyres: 4. Payload: Force Traveller N Delivery Van 4020WB/Wider Body: 2480 Kgs | Euler Motors Turbo EV 1000: 1000 Kgs | Evage Motors FR8: 928 Kgs | Hexall Mammoth HOP: NA.
Review all available price, mileage, power, torque, GVW, body type, tyres, gearbox, chassis, and extra specification details below before shortlisting a model.
Compare
Add Trucks to Compare
Details
Full Truck Details
Key Specifications16 specs
Price
₹14.84 L - ₹18.54 L
₹6.15 L - ₹8.35 L
₹29.10 L
₹16.00 L
Brand
force
euler-motors
evage-motors
hexall
Model
Force Traveller N Delivery Van 4020WB/Wider Body
Euler Motors Turbo EV 1000
Evage Motors FR8
Hexall Mammoth HOP
Body Type
4 Wheeler
4 Wheeler
4 Wheeler
4 Wheeler
Engine
FM 2.6 CR ED, 4 Cylinder Common Rail, DI TCIC
NA
NA
NA
Power
114 Hp
15 kW
18.3 kW
NA
Max Torque
350 Nm
120 Nm
114 Nm
NA
Mileage
10-12 km/l
197 Km/full charge
100 km/charge
110 KM/Charge
Gross Vehicle Weight
5800 kg
1900 kg
2550 kg
1680 kg
Payload
2480 Kgs
1000 Kgs
928 Kgs
NA
No. of Tyres
4
4
4
4
Fuel Type
Diesel
Electric
Electric
Electric
Fuel Tank Capacity
70 Ltr
15.36 kWh
21.6kwh
7.37 kWh
Max Speed
80 Km/h
65 Km/h
55 km/h
60 Km/h
Gear Box
G32-5, Synchromesh, 5 Forward + 1 Reverse
1 Forward + 1 Reverse
Single Speed 2 Stage Clutchfree
NA
Chassis Type
Chassis with Cabin
Chassis with Cabin
Chassis with Cabin
Chassis with Cabin
Performance15 specs
Max Power
114 Hp
15 kW
18.3 kW
-
Engine Displacement (cc)
2596 cc
-
-
-
Engine
FM 2.6 CR ED, 4 Cylinder Common Rail, DI TCIC
-
-
-
Fuel Type
Diesel
Electric
Electric
Electric
Emission Norms
BS-VI Stage 2
-
Zero Tailpipe
Zero Tailpipe
Max Torque
350 Nm
120 Nm
114 Nm
-
Engine Cylinders
4
-
-
-
Turning Radius (mm)
7000
4400
6000
3500
Product Type
L5N (High Speed Goods Carrier)
L5N (High Speed Goods Carrier)
-
L5N (High Speed Goods Carrier)
Carrier Type
Goods Carrier
Goods Carrier
-
Goods Carrier
Max Speed (km/h)
-
65
55
60
Range
-
135
100
110
Battery Capacity
-
15.36 kWh
21.6kwh
7.37 kWh
Type of Motor
-
LV AC PMSM
Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motors (PMSMs)
Electric Motor
Gradeability (%)
-
-
12 %
-
Dimension10 specs
Overall Length (mm)
6965
3950
5310
3500
Overall Width (mm)
2245
1535
1740
1590
Overall Height (mm)
2720
2440
2250
1800
Ground Clearance (mm)
180
130
160
180
Wheelbase (mm)
4020
2080
2700
-
Loading Length {mm}
4653
-
3810
-
Loading Width {mm}
2000
-
1737
-
Loading Height {mm}
1880
-
1706
-
Size (Cu. M)
-
200
-
-
Axle Configuration
-
-
4x2
4x2
Transmission & Loading Capacity6 specs
Transmission
Manual
Automatic
Manual
Automatic
Payload (Kgs)
2480 Kgs
1000 Kgs
928 Kgs
-
GVW / GCW (Kgs)
5800 kg
1900 kg
2550 kg
1680 kg
Gear Box
G32-5, Synchromesh, 5 Forward + 1 Reverse
-
Single Speed 2 Stage Clutchfree
-
Power Steering
-
Kerb Weight (Kgs)
-
-
1643
-
Features13 specs
Steering
Power Steering
Ergo Mech Steering
Manual Steering
Steering Control
A/C
-
Seat Type
Standard
-
Standard
Standard
Driver Information Display
-
Adjustable Driver Seat
-
Seating Capacity
D+1
D + 1
D+1
D+11
Tubeless Tyres
-
Seat Belts
-
Navigation System
-
Hill Hold
-
Cruise Control
-
-
Telematics
-
-
Arm-rest
-
-
Brakes & Suspension5 specs
Brakes
Disc Brakes
Hydraulic | Single Pedal Actuation, Disc & Drum Brakes
Disc & Drum Brake
Vacuum assisted Brakes
Front Suspension
Spring Semi-elliptical, Shock absorbers Hydraulic telescopic double acting Anti-Roll Bar
Hydraulic shock absorber with parabolic leafspring
Double Wishbone Suspension
Leaf spring suspension
Rear Suspension
Spring Semi-elliptical, Shock absorbers Hydraulic telescopic double acting Anti-Roll Bar
Hydraulic shock absorber with semi-elliptical leafspring
Leaf Spring Suspension
Leaf Spring Suspension
ABS
-
Parking Brakes
-
Mechanical Lever
Body Option & Cabin Type4 specs
Chassis Type
Chassis with Cabin
Chassis with Cabin
Chassis with Cabin
Chassis with Cabin
Body Option
Monocoque Body
Deck Body
Box body
Fully Built
Cabin Type
Day Cabin
Day Cabin
Day Cabin
Day Cabin
Tiltable Cabin
-
-
-
Tyres3 specs
Number of Tyre
6
4
4
4
Rear Tyre
235/65 R16, Radial
145 R12 LT 8PR
215/75 R15
-
Front Tyre
235/65 R16, Radial
145 R12 LT 8PR
215/75 R15
-
Others3 specs
Chassis
Fog Lights
-
Battery(Volts)
-
76.8 Vdc
48 V
48 V
Charging1 specs
Charging Time
-
4 - 4.5 hrs
20 Minutes
6-8 hrs
Other Details3 specs
Usecase
-
Small business logistics, Last-mile delivery
Last-Mile Logistics & Parcel Delivery, FMCG & Grocery Distribution, Industrial/Urban Logistics
E-commerce & Parcel Delivery, Small Business Transport
Charging Time
-
4 - 4.5 Hours
20 Minutes
6-8 hrs
Type Of Motor
-
LV AC PMSM
Type of MotorPermanent Magnet Synchronous Motors (PMSMs)
Electric Motor
Which to buy
Which One Fits Your Use Case?
FAQs
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, Force Traveller N Delivery Van 4020WB/Wider Body vs Euler Motors Turbo EV 1000 vs Evage Motors FR8 vs Hexall Mammoth HOP?
+−
Euler Motors Turbo EV 1000 has the lower price among these options.
Which has better power, Force Traveller N Delivery Van 4020WB/Wider Body vs Euler Motors Turbo EV 1000 vs Evage Motors FR8 vs Hexall Mammoth HOP?
+−
Force Traveller N Delivery Van 4020WB/Wider Body has the better power at 114 HP.
Which has better torque, Force Traveller N Delivery Van 4020WB/Wider Body vs Euler Motors Turbo EV 1000 vs Evage Motors FR8 vs Hexall Mammoth HOP?
+−
Force Traveller N Delivery Van 4020WB/Wider Body has the better torque at 350.
Which has better mileage, Force Traveller N Delivery Van 4020WB/Wider Body vs Euler Motors Turbo EV 1000 vs Evage Motors FR8 vs Hexall Mammoth HOP?
+−
Euler Motors Turbo EV 1000 has the better mileage at 197 km/l.
Which has better payload, Force Traveller N Delivery Van 4020WB/Wider Body vs Euler Motors Turbo EV 1000 vs Evage Motors FR8 vs Hexall Mammoth HOP?
+−
Force Traveller N Delivery Van 4020WB/Wider Body has the better payload at 2480 kg.
Which has better GVW, Force Traveller N Delivery Van 4020WB/Wider Body vs Euler Motors Turbo EV 1000 vs Evage Motors FR8 vs Hexall Mammoth HOP?
+−
Force Traveller N Delivery Van 4020WB/Wider Body has the better GVW at 5800 kg.
Which truck should I choose between Force Traveller N Delivery Van 4020WB/Wider Body and Euler Motors Turbo EV 1000?
+−
Choose Force Traveller N Delivery Van 4020WB/Wider Body if its price, body type, fuel type, and payload fit your route and loading needs better. Choose Euler Motors Turbo EV 1000 if its specifications, service fit, or operating cost suits your business use case more closely.
What fuel types are available in Force Traveller N Delivery Van 4020WB/Wider Body vs Euler Motors Turbo EV 1000 vs Evage Motors FR8 vs Hexall Mammoth HOP?
+−
Force Traveller N Delivery Van 4020WB/Wider Body vs Euler Motors Turbo EV 1000 vs Evage Motors FR8 vs Hexall Mammoth HOP include Diesel, Electric fuel options. Buyers should compare fuel availability, route distance, and daily running cost before finalizing a truck.
What body types are compared in Force Traveller N Delivery Van 4020WB/Wider Body vs Euler Motors Turbo EV 1000 vs Evage Motors FR8 vs Hexall Mammoth HOP?
+−
This comparison includes 4 Wheeler body type. Match the body type with your cargo, loading pattern, and city or highway route requirement.
How do tyre configurations compare in Force Traveller N Delivery Van 4020WB/Wider Body vs Euler Motors Turbo EV 1000 vs Evage Motors FR8 vs Hexall Mammoth HOP?
+−
Force Traveller N Delivery Van 4020WB/Wider Body has 4 tyres, Euler Motors Turbo EV 1000 has 4 tyres, Evage Motors FR8 has 4 tyres, Hexall Mammoth HOP has 4 tyres. Tyre configuration matters for load stability, operating conditions, and maintenance planning.