Truck Comparison

Arzoo Garbage Van vs Baxy Mobility Bindas FE vs Ak Auto Electrical Divya Rath Loader vs Piaggio Ape Xtra Classic 2100/LDX Classic: Price & Specs Comparison

Baxy Mobility Bindas FE is the more affordable option here by about ₹4,000. Ak Auto Electrical Divya Rath Loader leads on mileage at 80 km/l. The compared trucks cover 3 Wheeler body type with Electric, Diesel fuel options.

This comparison uses the available truck data for Arzoo Garbage Van vs Baxy Mobility Bindas FE vs Ak Auto Electrical Divya Rath Loader vs Piaggio Ape Xtra Classic 2100/LDX Classic so you can check which model fits better for your budget, route, payload requirement, fuel preference, and daily business usage.

Body type: 3 Wheeler. Fuel options: Electric, Diesel. Tyres: 3. Payload: Arzoo Garbage Van: 500 Kgs | Baxy Mobility Bindas FE: No | Ak Auto Electrical Divya Rath Loader: 415 Kgs | Piaggio Ape Xtra Classic 2100/LDX Classic: 511 Kgs.

Review all available price, mileage, power, torque, GVW, body type, tyres, gearbox, chassis, and extra specification details below before shortlisting a model.

Compare

Add Trucks to Compare

Details

Full Truck Details

Key Specifications
Price
₹2.45 L
₹2.40 L
₹2.44 L
₹2.45 L
Brand
arzoo
baxy
ak-auto-electrical
piaggio
Model
Arzoo Garbage Van
Baxy Mobility Bindas FE
Ak Auto Electrical Divya Rath Loader
Piaggio Ape Xtra Classic 2100/LDX Classic
Body Type
3 Wheeler
3 Wheeler
3 Wheeler
3 Wheeler
Engine
NA
435 cc
NA
435 cc
Power
1 hp
5.7 kW
1 hp
5.7 KWS
Max Torque
NA
19 Nm
42 Nm
19 Nm
Mileage
30 km/Per Charge
28 kmpl
80-100 km/charge
29.4 kmpl
Gross Vehicle Weight
500 kg
435 kg
392 kg
975 kg
Payload
500 Kgs
No
415 Kgs
511 Kgs
No. of Tyres
3
3
3
3
Fuel Type
Electric
Diesel
Electric
Diesel
Fuel Tank Capacity
110 Ah
11 Ltr
100 Ah
10 Ltr
Max Speed
25 Km/h
32 km/h
25 km/h
45 Km/h
Gear Box
1 Forward + 1 Reverse
4 Forward + 1 Reverse
1 Forward + 1 Reverse
4 Forward + 1 Reverse
Chassis Type
Heavy Duty CRCA
Chassis with Cabin
Square Tubular Pipe
Chassis with Cabin
Performance
Max Power
2 hp
5.7 kW
1 hp
5.7 kW
Fuel Type
Electric
Diesel
Electric
Diesel
Emission Norms
Zero Tailpipe
BS-VI
Zero Tailpipe
BS VI
Gradeability (%)
20 %
-
10 %
26 %
Max Speed (km/h)
25
60
25
45
Range
30
-
80-100
-
Battery Capacity
110 Ah
7.37 kWh
100 Ah
50 Ah
Type of Motor
BLDC Motor
-
BLDC Motor
-
Carrier Type
Goods Carrier
Goods Carrier
-
Goods Carrier
Product Type
L3N (Low Speed Goods Carrier)
L3N (Low Speed Goods Carrier)
-
L3N (Low Speed Goods Carrier)
Engine Displacement (cc)
-
435 cc
-
435 cc
Fuel Tank (Litres)
-
11 Ltr
-
10 Ltr
Engine
-
Greaves BSVI OBD II Engine
-
Naturally Aspirated, Air Cooled Engine
Max Torque
-
19 Nm
42 Nm
19 Nm
Mileage
-
28 kmpl
-
29.4 kmpl
Engine Cylinders
-
1
-
Single cylinder
Turning Radius (mm)
-
3500
1500
-
Motor Capacity
-
-
950 Watt
-
Charging
Charging Time
5 Hrs
-
4-6 Hrs
-
Dimension
Overall Length (mm)
1250
2130
2610
3145
Overall Width (mm)
990
1320
1000
1490
Overall Height (mm)
1820
1780
1780
1770
Ground Clearance (mm)
180
220
120
235
Wheelbase (mm)
1800
1395
2100
2100
Axle Configuration
3x3
3x3
3x3
3x3
Loading Length {mm}
-
1680
-
-
Loading Width {mm}
-
1320
-
-
Loading Height {mm}
-
442
-
-
Transmission & Loading Capacity
Transmission
Automatic
Manual
Autmoatic
Manual
Payload (Kgs)
500 Kgs
-
415 Kgs
511 Kgs
GVW / GCW (Kgs)
500 kg
435 kg
392 kg
975 kg
Kerb Weight (Kgs)
310
-
-
464
Gear Box
1 Forward + 1 Reverse
4 Forward + 1 Reverse
1 Forward + 1 Reverse
4 Forward + 1 Reverse
Power Steering
Clutch
-
-
-
Multi Plate Wet Type
Features
Steering
Handle bar type
Handle bar type
Handle bar type
Handle bar type
A/C
Cruise Control
Navigation System
Telematics
Tiltable Steering
Arm-rest
Seat Type
Standard
Standard
Standard
Standard
Driver Information Display
Adjustable Driver Seat
Seating Capacity
Driver Only
Driver Only
Driver Only
Driver Only
Tubeless Tyres
Seat Belts
Hill Hold
Brakes & Suspension
Brakes
Drum Brake
Drum Brake
Hydraulic Brakes
Drum Brake Hydraulic Actuated Internal Expanding Shoe Type
Front Suspension
Telescopic Shockers
Telescopic front suspension
Haydraulic Suspension
Hydraulic Telescopic Shock Absorber With Helical Compression Spring with dampener
Rear Suspension
Leaf Spring
Leaf Spring Suspension
Leaf Spring
Hydraulic Telescopic Shock Absorber With Rubber Compression Spring with dampener
ABS
Parking Brakes
Body Option & Cabin Type
Chassis Type
Heavy Duty CRCA
Chassis with Cabin
Square Tubular Pipe
Chassis with Cabin
Body Option
Box body
Deck Body
Box body
Deck Body
Cabin Type
Day Cabin
Day Cabin
Day Cabin
Day Cabin
Tiltable Cabin
Tyres
Number of Tyre
3
3
3
3
Rear Tyre
90/90- 12
4.50 x 8
90-90/12
4.50-10,8 PR
Front Tyre
90/90- 12
4.50 x 8
90-90/12
4.50-10,8 PR
Others
Chassis
Battery(Volts)
48 V
48 V
12 V
12V
Alternator (Amps)
55
-
-
-
Fog Lights
Loading Platform Area(Sq.ft)
-
6.5
-
-
Other Details
Charging Time
5 Hours
No
4-6 Hrs
No
Type Of Motor
BLDC Motor
No
BLDC Motor
No
Rating
4.5
4.5
-
4.5
Usecase
Municipal solid waste
Shared rides, Short-distance commute, Feeder service
Logistics
Logistics

Which to buy

Which One Fits Your Use Case?

FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Arzoo Garbage Van vs Baxy Mobility Bindas FE vs Ak Auto Electrical Divya Rath Loader vs Piaggio Ape Xtra Classic 2100/LDX Classic?

+
Baxy Mobility Bindas FE has the lower price among these options.

Which has better torque, Arzoo Garbage Van vs Baxy Mobility Bindas FE vs Ak Auto Electrical Divya Rath Loader vs Piaggio Ape Xtra Classic 2100/LDX Classic?

+
Ak Auto Electrical Divya Rath Loader has the better torque at 42.

Which has better mileage, Arzoo Garbage Van vs Baxy Mobility Bindas FE vs Ak Auto Electrical Divya Rath Loader vs Piaggio Ape Xtra Classic 2100/LDX Classic?

+
Ak Auto Electrical Divya Rath Loader has the better mileage at 80 km/l.

Which has better payload, Arzoo Garbage Van vs Baxy Mobility Bindas FE vs Ak Auto Electrical Divya Rath Loader vs Piaggio Ape Xtra Classic 2100/LDX Classic?

+
Piaggio Ape Xtra Classic 2100/LDX Classic has the better payload at 511 kg.

Which has better GVW, Arzoo Garbage Van vs Baxy Mobility Bindas FE vs Ak Auto Electrical Divya Rath Loader vs Piaggio Ape Xtra Classic 2100/LDX Classic?

+
Piaggio Ape Xtra Classic 2100/LDX Classic has the better GVW at 975 kg.

Which truck should I choose between Arzoo Garbage Van and Baxy Mobility Bindas FE?

+
Choose Arzoo Garbage Van if its price, body type, fuel type, and payload fit your route and loading needs better. Choose Baxy Mobility Bindas FE if its specifications, service fit, or operating cost suits your business use case more closely.

What fuel types are available in Arzoo Garbage Van vs Baxy Mobility Bindas FE vs Ak Auto Electrical Divya Rath Loader vs Piaggio Ape Xtra Classic 2100/LDX Classic?

+
Arzoo Garbage Van vs Baxy Mobility Bindas FE vs Ak Auto Electrical Divya Rath Loader vs Piaggio Ape Xtra Classic 2100/LDX Classic include Electric, Diesel fuel options. Buyers should compare fuel availability, route distance, and daily running cost before finalizing a truck.

What body types are compared in Arzoo Garbage Van vs Baxy Mobility Bindas FE vs Ak Auto Electrical Divya Rath Loader vs Piaggio Ape Xtra Classic 2100/LDX Classic?

+
This comparison includes 3 Wheeler body type. Match the body type with your cargo, loading pattern, and city or highway route requirement.

How do tyre configurations compare in Arzoo Garbage Van vs Baxy Mobility Bindas FE vs Ak Auto Electrical Divya Rath Loader vs Piaggio Ape Xtra Classic 2100/LDX Classic?

+
Arzoo Garbage Van has 3 tyres, Baxy Mobility Bindas FE has 3 tyres, Ak Auto Electrical Divya Rath Loader has 3 tyres, Piaggio Ape Xtra Classic 2100/LDX Classic has 3 tyres. Tyre configuration matters for load stability, operating conditions, and maintenance planning.