Truck Comparison

Arzoo Garbage Van vs JSA NV Diesel Loader vs Piaggio Ape Xtra Classic vs Piaggio Ape Xtra LDX: Price & Specs Comparison

Arzoo Garbage Van is the more affordable option here by about ₹5,000. JSA NV Diesel Loader leads on GVW at 995 kg. The compared trucks cover 3 Wheeler body type with Electric, Diesel, LPG fuel options.

This comparison uses the available truck data for Arzoo Garbage Van vs JSA NV Diesel Loader vs Piaggio Ape Xtra Classic vs Piaggio Ape Xtra LDX so you can check which model fits better for your budget, route, payload requirement, fuel preference, and daily business usage.

Body type: 3 Wheeler. Fuel options: Electric, Diesel, LPG. Tyres: 3. Payload: Arzoo Garbage Van: 500 Kgs | JSA NV Diesel Loader: 537 Kgs | Piaggio Ape Xtra Classic: 533 Kgs | Piaggio Ape Xtra LDX: 496 Kgs.

Review all available price, mileage, power, torque, GVW, body type, tyres, gearbox, chassis, and extra specification details below before shortlisting a model.

Compare

Add Trucks to Compare

Details

Full Truck Details

Specs
This TruckArzoo Garbage Van

₹2.45 L

Piaggio Ape Xtra Classic

₹2.45 L - ₹2.55 L

Piaggio Ape Xtra LDX

₹2.45 L - ₹2.55 L

Key Specifications
Price
₹2.45 L
₹2.50 L
₹2.45 L - ₹2.55 L
₹2.45 L - ₹2.55 L
Brand
arzoo
jsa
piaggio
piaggio
Model
Arzoo Garbage Van
JSA NV Diesel Loader
Piaggio Ape Xtra Classic
Piaggio Ape Xtra LDX
Body Type
3 Wheeler
3 Wheeler
3 Wheeler
3 Wheeler
Engine
NA
597.7 cc
210 cc
599 cc
Power
1 hp
9.4 hp
NA
9.4 hp
Max Torque
NA
23.5 Nm
23.5 Nm
23.5 Nm
Mileage
30 km/Per Charge
25 Kmpl
29.4 kmpl
22 kmpl
Gross Vehicle Weight
500 kg
995 kg
975 kg
975 kg
Payload
500 Kgs
537 Kgs
533 Kgs
496 Kgs
No. of Tyres
3
3
3
3
Fuel Type
Electric
Diesel
LPG
Diesel
Fuel Tank Capacity
110 Ah
10.25 Ltr
40Ltr
10.5 Ltr
Max Speed
25 Km/h
50 km/h
56 Km/h
60 Km/h
Gear Box
1 Forward + 1 Reverse
Constant Mesh
1 Forward + 1 Reverse
5 Forward + 1 Reverse
Chassis Type
Heavy Duty CRCA
Chassis with Cabin
Chassis with Cabin
Chassis with Cabin
Performance
Max Power
2 hp
7 kW
5.7 kW
9.4 hp
Fuel Type
Electric
Diesel
Diesel
Diesel
Emission Norms
Zero Tailpipe
BS-VI
BS VI
BS-VI
Gradeability (%)
20 %
29 %
26 %
22.2 %
Max Speed (km/h)
25
50
45
60
Range
30
-
-
-
Battery Capacity
110 Ah
50 Ah
50 Ah
35 Ah
Type of Motor
BLDC Motor
-
-
-
Carrier Type
Goods Carrier
Goods Carrier
Goods Carrier
Goods Carrier
Product Type
L3N (Low Speed Goods Carrier)
L3N (Low Speed Goods Carrier)
L3N (Low Speed Goods Carrier)
L3N (Low Speed Goods Carrier)
Engine Displacement (cc)
-
597.7 cc
435 cc
599 cc
Fuel Tank (Litres)
-
10.25 Ltr
10 Ltr
10.5 Ltr
Engine
-
E-Di 599 WD
Naturally Aspirated, Air Cooled Engine
Single Cylinder water Cooled
Max Torque
-
23.5 Nm
19 Nm
23.5 Nm
Mileage City
-
25-30
-
22-25
Mileage Highway
-
Dec-15
-
25-28
Mileage
-
25 kmpl
29.4 kmpl
22 kmpl
Engine Cylinders
-
1
Single cylinder
1
Turning Radius (mm)
-
-
-
3800
Charging
Charging Time
5 Hrs
-
-
-
Dimension
Overall Length (mm)
1250
3100
2965
3145
Overall Width (mm)
990
1480
1490
1490
Overall Height (mm)
1820
1700
1770
1770
Ground Clearance (mm)
180
155
235
245
Wheelbase (mm)
1800
2100
1920
2100
Axle Configuration
3x3
3x3
3x3
3x3
Loading Length {mm}
-
-
-
1660
Loading Width {mm}
-
-
-
1400
Loading Height {mm}
-
-
-
285
Transmission & Loading Capacity
Transmission
Automatic
Manual
Manual
Constant mesh
Payload (Kgs)
500 Kgs
460 Kgs
511 Kgs
496 Kgs
GVW / GCW (Kgs)
500 kg
995 kg
975 kg
975 kg
Kerb Weight (Kgs)
310
467
450
479
Gear Box
1 Forward + 1 Reverse
Constant Mesh
4 Forward + 1 Reverse
5 Forward + 1 Reverse
Power Steering
Clutch
-
Wet Multiplate
Multi Plate Wet Type
Multi Disc Wet Type
Features
Steering
Handle bar type
Handle bar type
Handle bar type
Handle bar type
A/C
Cruise Control
Navigation System
Telematics
Tiltable Steering
Arm-rest
Seat Type
Standard
Standard
Standard
Standard
Driver Information Display
Adjustable Driver Seat
Seating Capacity
Driver Only
Driver Only
Driver Only
Driver Only
Tubeless Tyres
Seat Belts
Hill Hold
Brakes & Suspension
Brakes
Drum Brake
Drum Brakes
Drum Brake Hydraulic Actuated Internal Expanding Shoe Type
Drum Brake
Front Suspension
Telescopic Shockers
Coil Spring
Hydraulic Telescopic Shock Absorber With Helical Compression Spring with dampener
Hydraulic Telescopic Shock Absorber with Helical Compression Spring with Damper
Rear Suspension
Leaf Spring
Rubber Damper
Hydraulic Telescopic Shock Absorber With Rubber Compression Spring with dampener
Rubber Spring with damper
ABS
Parking Brakes
Body Option & Cabin Type
Chassis Type
Heavy Duty CRCA
Chassis with Cabin
Chassis with Cabin
Chassis with Cabin
Body Option
Box body
Deck Body
Deck Body
Deck Body
Cabin Type
Day Cabin
Day Cabin
Day Cabin
Day Cabin
Tiltable Cabin
Tyres
Number of Tyre
3
3
3
3
Rear Tyre
90/90- 12
4.50-10, 8PR
4.50-10,8 PR
4.50-10, 8 PR
Front Tyre
90/90- 12
4.50-10, 8PR
4.50-10,8 PR
4.50-10, 8 PR
Others
Chassis
Battery(Volts)
48 V
12 V
12V
12V
Alternator (Amps)
55
-
-
-
Fog Lights
Loading Platform Area(Sq.ft)
-
-
-
30.25
Other Details
Charging Time
5 Hours
No
No
No
Type Of Motor
BLDC Motor
No
No
No
Rating
4.5
4.8
4.5
4.5
Usecase
Municipal solid waste
logistics
Logistics
Logistics

Which to buy

Which One Fits Your Use Case?

FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Arzoo Garbage Van vs JSA NV Diesel Loader vs Piaggio Ape Xtra Classic vs Piaggio Ape Xtra LDX?

+
Arzoo Garbage Van has the lower price among these options.

Which has better mileage, Arzoo Garbage Van vs JSA NV Diesel Loader vs Piaggio Ape Xtra Classic vs Piaggio Ape Xtra LDX?

+
Arzoo Garbage Van has the better mileage at 30 km/l.

Which has better payload, Arzoo Garbage Van vs JSA NV Diesel Loader vs Piaggio Ape Xtra Classic vs Piaggio Ape Xtra LDX?

+
JSA NV Diesel Loader has the better payload at 537 kg.

Which has better GVW, Arzoo Garbage Van vs JSA NV Diesel Loader vs Piaggio Ape Xtra Classic vs Piaggio Ape Xtra LDX?

+
JSA NV Diesel Loader has the better GVW at 995 kg.

Which truck should I choose between Arzoo Garbage Van and JSA NV Diesel Loader?

+
Choose Arzoo Garbage Van if its price, body type, fuel type, and payload fit your route and loading needs better. Choose JSA NV Diesel Loader if its specifications, service fit, or operating cost suits your business use case more closely.

What fuel types are available in Arzoo Garbage Van vs JSA NV Diesel Loader vs Piaggio Ape Xtra Classic vs Piaggio Ape Xtra LDX?

+
Arzoo Garbage Van vs JSA NV Diesel Loader vs Piaggio Ape Xtra Classic vs Piaggio Ape Xtra LDX include Electric, Diesel, LPG fuel options. Buyers should compare fuel availability, route distance, and daily running cost before finalizing a truck.

What body types are compared in Arzoo Garbage Van vs JSA NV Diesel Loader vs Piaggio Ape Xtra Classic vs Piaggio Ape Xtra LDX?

+
This comparison includes 3 Wheeler body type. Match the body type with your cargo, loading pattern, and city or highway route requirement.

How do tyre configurations compare in Arzoo Garbage Van vs JSA NV Diesel Loader vs Piaggio Ape Xtra Classic vs Piaggio Ape Xtra LDX?

+
Arzoo Garbage Van has 3 tyres, JSA NV Diesel Loader has 3 tyres, Piaggio Ape Xtra Classic has 3 tyres, Piaggio Ape Xtra LDX has 3 tyres. Tyre configuration matters for load stability, operating conditions, and maintenance planning.