Truck Comparison

Arzoo Loader vs Eko Tejas Food Cart vs Eko Tejas RUGD-121 vs Etron Midbin: Price & Specs Comparison

Arzoo Loader is the more affordable option here by about ₹2,000. Etron Midbin leads on payload at 800 kg. The compared trucks cover 3 Wheeler body type with Electric fuel option.

This comparison uses the available truck data for Arzoo Loader vs Eko Tejas Food Cart vs Eko Tejas RUGD-121 vs Etron Midbin so you can check which model fits better for your budget, route, payload requirement, fuel preference, and daily business usage.

Body type: 3 Wheeler. Fuel option: Electric. Tyres: 3. Payload: Arzoo Loader: 310 Kgs | Eko Tejas Food Cart: 452 kgs | Eko Tejas RUGD-121: 265 Kgs | Etron Midbin: 800 kgs .

Review all available price, mileage, power, torque, GVW, body type, tyres, gearbox, chassis, and extra specification details below before shortlisting a model.

Compare

Add Trucks to Compare

Details

Full Truck Details

Specs
This TruckArzoo Loader

₹1.35 L

Etron Midbin

₹1.37 L

Key Specifications
Price
₹1.35 L
₹1.39 L
₹1.39 L
₹1.37 L
Brand
arzoo
eko-tejas
eko-tejas
etron
Model
Arzoo Loader
Eko Tejas Food Cart
Eko Tejas RUGD-121
Etron Midbin
Body Type
3 Wheeler
3 Wheeler
3 Wheeler
3 Wheeler
Engine
NA
NA
NA
NA
Power
1 hp
1 hp
1 hp
1 hp
Max Torque
30 Nm
NA
NA
42 Nm
Mileage
120
80-120
80-120
100-140 KM/Full Charge
Gross Vehicle Weight
310 kg
810 kg
700 kg
370 kg
Payload
310 Kgs
452 kgs
265 Kgs
800 kgs
No. of Tyres
3
3
3
3
Fuel Type
Electric
Electric
Electric
Electric
Fuel Tank Capacity
140 Ah
5.76kWh
6.24kWh
120 Ah
Max Speed
25 Km/h
25
25
25 km/h
Gear Box
1 Forward + 1 Reverse
1 Forward + 1 Reverse
1 Forward + 1 Reverse
1 Forward + 1 Reverse
Chassis Type
Chassis with Cabin
Chassis with Cabin
Chassis with Cabin
Chassis with Cabin
Performance
Max Power
1 hp
-
-
1 hp
Fuel Type
Electric
-
-
Electric
Emission Norms
Zero Tailpipe
-
-
Zero Tailpipe
Max Torque
30 Nm
-
-
42 Nm
Gradeability (%)
10 %
-
-
20 %
Max Speed (km/h)
25
-
-
25
Turning Radius (mm)
4800
-
-
5000
Range
120
-
-
100-140
Battery Capacity
140 Ah
-
-
120 Ah
Type of Motor
BLDC Motor
-
-
1200 W Differential DC motor
Carrier Type
Goods Carrier
-
-
Goods Carrier
Product Type
L3N (Low Speed Goods Carrier)
-
-
L3N (Low Speed Goods Carrier)
Charging
Charging Time
7 Hours
-
-
8-12 hours
Dimension
Overall Length (mm)
1255
-
-
2800
Overall Width (mm)
900
-
-
1000
Overall Height (mm)
430
-
-
1750
Ground Clearance (mm)
180
-
-
250
Wheelbase (mm)
2170
-
-
1960
Axle Configuration
3x3
-
-
3x3
Transmission & Loading Capacity
Transmission
Automatic
-
-
Shaft Drive
Payload (Kgs)
310 Kgs
-
-
800 Kgs
GVW / GCW (Kgs)
310 kg
-
-
370 kg
Kerb Weight (Kgs)
310
-
-
370
Gear Box
1 Forward + 1 Reverse
-
-
1 Forward + 1 Reverse
Power Steering
-
-
Features
Steering
Handle bar type
-
-
Handle bar type
A/C
-
-
Cruise Control
-
-
Navigation System
-
-
Telematics
-
-
Tiltable Steering
-
-
Arm-rest
-
-
Seat Type
Standard
-
-
Standard
Driver Information Display
-
-
Adjustable Driver Seat
-
-
Seating Capacity
Driver Only
-
-
Driver Only
Tubeless Tyres
-
-
Seat Belts
-
-
Hill Hold
-
-
Brakes & Suspension
Brakes
Drum Brake
-
-
Drum Brakes
Front Suspension
Telescopic Shockers
-
-
Hydraulic Telescopic Suspension
Rear Suspension
Leaf Spring
-
-
Heavy-duty suspension
ABS
-
-
Parking Brakes
-
-
Body Option & Cabin Type
Chassis Type
Chassis with Cabin
-
-
Chassis with Cabin
Body Option
Deck Body
-
-
Deck Body
Cabin Type
Day Cabin
-
-
Day Cabin
Tiltable Cabin
-
-
Tyres
Number of Tyre
3
-
-
3
Rear Tyre
3.75-12
-
-
400/12
Front Tyre
3.75-12
-
-
400/12
Others
Chassis
-
-
Loading Platform Area(Sq.ft)
4.85
-
-
370
Battery(Volts)
48 V
-
-
48 V
Alternator (Amps)
55
-
-
-
Fog Lights
-
-
Other Details
Charging Time
7 Hours
4-5 Hours
4-5 Hours
8-12 Hours
Type Of Motor
BLDC Motor
Dc Brushless Motor
Dc Brushless Motor
1200 W Differential DC motor
Rating
4.5
-
-
4.8
Usecase
Transport, Logistics
Last-mile delivery, Small business logistics
Small business logistics, Last-mile delivery
Last-mile delivery, Small business logistics, Agriculture

Which to buy

Which One Fits Your Use Case?

FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Arzoo Loader vs Eko Tejas Food Cart vs Eko Tejas RUGD-121 vs Etron Midbin?

+
Arzoo Loader has the lower price among these options.

Which has better torque, Arzoo Loader vs Eko Tejas Food Cart vs Eko Tejas RUGD-121 vs Etron Midbin?

+
Etron Midbin has the better torque at 42.

Which has better mileage, Arzoo Loader vs Eko Tejas Food Cart vs Eko Tejas RUGD-121 vs Etron Midbin?

+
Arzoo Loader has the better mileage at 120 km/l.

Which has better payload, Arzoo Loader vs Eko Tejas Food Cart vs Eko Tejas RUGD-121 vs Etron Midbin?

+
Etron Midbin has the better payload at 800 kg.

Which has better GVW, Arzoo Loader vs Eko Tejas Food Cart vs Eko Tejas RUGD-121 vs Etron Midbin?

+
Eko Tejas Food Cart has the better GVW at 810 kg.

Which truck should I choose between Arzoo Loader and Eko Tejas Food Cart?

+
Choose Arzoo Loader if its price, body type, fuel type, and payload fit your route and loading needs better. Choose Eko Tejas Food Cart if its specifications, service fit, or operating cost suits your business use case more closely.

What fuel types are available in Arzoo Loader vs Eko Tejas Food Cart vs Eko Tejas RUGD-121 vs Etron Midbin?

+
Arzoo Loader vs Eko Tejas Food Cart vs Eko Tejas RUGD-121 vs Etron Midbin include Electric fuel option. Buyers should compare fuel availability, route distance, and daily running cost before finalizing a truck.

What body types are compared in Arzoo Loader vs Eko Tejas Food Cart vs Eko Tejas RUGD-121 vs Etron Midbin?

+
This comparison includes 3 Wheeler body type. Match the body type with your cargo, loading pattern, and city or highway route requirement.

How do tyre configurations compare in Arzoo Loader vs Eko Tejas Food Cart vs Eko Tejas RUGD-121 vs Etron Midbin?

+
Arzoo Loader has 3 tyres, Eko Tejas Food Cart has 3 tyres, Eko Tejas RUGD-121 has 3 tyres, Etron Midbin has 3 tyres. Tyre configuration matters for load stability, operating conditions, and maintenance planning.