Ashok Leyland AVTR 2825-6x4 RMC vs Ashok Leyland AVTR 3525-8x4 RMC vs Ashok Leyland AVTR 3525-8x4 RMC 5250/9 Cum/RMC vs Eicher Pro 6035TM vs Tata Prima 2830.K REPTO vs Tata Signa 2823.K RMC STD 6S: Price & Specs Comparison
By TruckOnWheels Editorial Team · Last updated 30 Dec 2025
Ashok Leyland AVTR 2825-6x4 RMC is the more affordable option here by about ₹1,18,000. Tata Signa 2823.K RMC STD 6S leads on payload at 26000 kg.
![]() Ashok Leyland AVTR 2825-6x4 RMC ₹51.00 Lakh - ₹52.50 Lakh | ![]() Ashok Leyland AVTR 3525-8x4 RMC ₹55.50 Lakh | ![]() Ashok Leyland AVTR 3525-8x4 RMC 5250/9 Cum/RMC ₹55.50 Lakh | ![]() Eicher Pro 6035TM ₹50.18 Lakh - ₹57.18 Lakh | ![]() Tata Prima 2830.K REPTO ₹53.68 Lakh | ![]() Tata Signa 2823.K RMC STD 6S ₹47.79 Lakh - ₹54.79 Lakh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | ₹51.00 Lakh - ₹52.50 Lakh | ₹55.50 Lakh | ₹55.50 Lakh | ₹50.18 Lakh - ₹57.18 Lakh | ₹53.68 Lakh | ₹47.79 Lakh - ₹54.79 Lakh |
| Body Type | Transit Mixer | Transit Mixer | Transit Mixer | Transit Mixer | Transit Mixer | Transit Mixer |
| Engine | 5660 cc | 5660 cc | 5660 cc | 7698 cc | 6692 cc | 5635 cc |
| Power | 250 hp | 250 hp | 250 hp | 194 kW | 224 kW | 220 hp |
| Max Torque | 900 Nm Nm | 900 Nm Nm | 900 Nm Nm | 1000 Nm Nm | 1100 Nm Nm | 850 Nm Nm |
| Mileage | 2.75-3.75 kmpl | 2.25-3.25 kmpl | 2.25-3.25 kmpl | 2.5-3.5 kmpl | 2.25-3.25 kmpl | 2.75-3.75 kmpl |
| Gross Vehicle Weight | 28000 kg | 35000 kg | 35000 kg | 35000 kg | 28000 kg | 28000 kg |
| Payload | NA | 8000 Kgs | 8000 Kgs | 16000 Kgs | 17500 Kgs | 26000 Kgs |
| No. of Tyres | 10 | 10 | 10 | 12 | 10 | 10 |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel | Diesel | Diesel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Gear Box | 6 Speed – 2 Options: FGR 8.91:1 and 9.01:1; 9:1 Speed CGR 12.73:1 | 9 Speed CGR 12.73:1 | 9 Speed CGR 12.73:1 | ET140 S9, 8F+1C+1R | G1150 9 Speed | 6 Forward + 1 Reverse |
| Chassis Type | Chassis with Cabin | Chassis with Cabin | Chassis with Cabin | Chassis with Cabin | Chassis with Cabin | Chassis with Cabin |
You can compare up to 6 trucks at a time.
Review
Pros & Cons
Ashok Leyland AVTR 2825-6x4 RMC
Pros
- Strong and reliable performance suitable for demanding construction operations
- Extensive service network and easy availability of spare parts throughout India
- Improved fuel efficiency owing to the modern Avtr platform and optimized powertrain
Cons
- Higher initial purchase cost compared to older generation or less advanced truck models
- Large dimensions may present maneuverability challenges in tight urban areas or congested construction sites
- Significant fuel consumption inherent to heavy duty RMC operations despite efficiency improvements
Ashok Leyland AVTR 3525-8x4 RMC
Pros
- Strong brand reputation and extensive service network in India
- High load carrying capacity ideal for concrete transportation
- Robust chassis and drivetrain designed for heavy duty operations
Cons
- Higher initial purchase price compared to standard trucks
- Potentially higher operating costs due to fuel consumption and maintenance of specialized equipment
- Maneuverability can be challenging in congested construction sites
Ashok Leyland AVTR 3525-8x4 RMC 5250/9 Cum/RMC
Pros
- The Ashok Leyland Avtr 3525 8x4 Rmc 52509 Cumrmc boasts a powerful H-series engine (typically 250 HP) delivering high torque (around 900 Nm), ensuring excellent gradeability and sustained performance on challenging construction sites even with a full 9 cubic meter concrete load.
- Built on the robust AVTR modular platform, this RMC truck features a heavy-duty 8x4 chassis and a reliable bogie suspension system, providing superior structural integrity, stability, and durability essential for continuous operation in demanding Indian terrains.
- Its optimized 9 cubic meter mixer capacity, combined with the Avtr 3525 8x4 Rmc 52509 Cumrmc's high 35-ton GVW, allows for efficient and timely transportation of large volumes of concrete, significantly enhancing operational productivity and profitability for businesses.
Cons
- The Ashok Leyland Avtr 3525 8x4 Rmc 52509 Cumrmc represents a significant initial capital investment, and its heavy-duty nature implies higher operational costs, including fuel consumption (typically 2.5-3.5 km/l depending on load and terrain) and mandatory AdBlue refills for BS6 compliance.
- Given its long wheelbase and heavy 8x4 configuration, maneuvering the Avtr 3525 can be challenging in extremely congested urban construction sites or very tight, unpaved project areas, potentially impacting delivery times and requiring highly skilled drivers.
- The advanced BS6 emission technology in the Avtr 3525 8x4 Rmc 52509 Cumrmc, while eco-friendly, introduces additional maintenance complexities and the recurring cost of AdBlue, which needs to be factored into the overall running expenses.
Eicher Pro 6035TM
Pros
- Offers good fuel efficiency for its class
- Built with a robust and durable chassis
- Supported by a wide service and spare parts network
Cons
- Brand perception may not match global premium manufacturers
- Advanced features could demand specialized maintenance expertise
- Initial investment can be higher than basic segment alternatives
Tata Prima 2830.K REPTO
Pros
- Robust build quality designed for demanding Indian road conditions
- Powerful engine provides excellent performance for heavy loads and steep gradients
- High payload capacity allows for efficient transportation of goods or materials
Cons
- Higher initial purchase cost compared to more basic or older generation trucks
- Requires Diesel Exhaust Fluid AdBlue which adds to operational expenses and requires supply management
- Maintenance can be more complex due to advanced engine technology and electronic systems
Tata Signa 2823.K RMC STD 6S
Pros
- Reliable performance for demanding construction and infrastructure projects
- Extensive service network and readily available spare parts across India
- Robust chassis and powertrain engineered for heavy duty concrete mixer applications
Cons
- Fuel consumption can be relatively high typical for heavy duty concrete mixer trucks
- Maneuverability might be challenging in congested urban areas or tight construction sites
- Initial purchase price represents a significant capital investment for businesses
Which to buy
Which One Fits Your Use Case?
Ashok Leyland AVTR 2825-6x4 RMC
Best for:
- Construction material transport
Ashok Leyland AVTR 3525-8x4 RMC
Best for:
- Construction material transport
Ashok Leyland AVTR 3525-8x4 RMC 5250/9 Cum/RMC
Best for:
- Construction
Eicher Pro 6035TM
Best for:
- Construction
- Mining
- Road development
Tata Prima 2830.K REPTO
Best for:
- Construction material transport
- logistics
- Intercity transport of goods
Tata Signa 2823.K RMC STD 6S
Best for:
- Construction material transport
FAQs





