Truck Comparison
Ashok Leyland HIPPO 5536 6x4 vs Ashok Leyland TAURUS 3532 5250/19m3/Rock vs I-BOARD Ductor 5525 vs I-BOARD Long Haulage TT 5520: Price & Specs Comparison
Ashok Leyland HIPPO 5536 6x4 leads on GVW at 54998 kg. The compared trucks cover Tipper body type with Diesel, Electric fuel options.
This comparison uses the available truck data for Ashok Leyland HIPPO 5536 6x4 vs Ashok Leyland TAURUS 3532 5250/19m3/Rock vs I-BOARD Ductor 5525 vs I-BOARD Long Haulage TT 5520 so you can check which model fits better for your budget, route, payload requirement, fuel preference, and daily business usage.
Body type: Tipper. Fuel options: Diesel, Electric. Tyres: 10, 12, 6. Payload: Ashok Leyland HIPPO 5536 6x4: NA | Ashok Leyland TAURUS 3532 5250/19m3/Rock: NA | I-BOARD Ductor 5525: 55000 Kgs | I-BOARD Long Haulage TT 5520: 40000 Kgs.
Review all available price, mileage, power, torque, GVW, body type, tyres, gearbox, chassis, and extra specification details below before shortlisting a model.
Compare
Add Trucks to Compare
Details
Full Truck Details
Specs
Ashok Leyland TAURUS 3532 5250/19m3/Rock
Price on Request
I-BOARD Ductor 5525
Price on Request
I-BOARD Long Haulage TT 5520
Price on Request
Key Specifications16 specs
Price
Price on Request
Price on Request
Price on Request
Price on Request
Brand
ashok-leyland
ashok-leyland
i-board
i-board
Model
Ashok Leyland HIPPO 5536 6x4
Ashok Leyland TAURUS 3532 5250/19m3/Rock
I-BOARD Ductor 5525
I-BOARD Long Haulage TT 5520
Body Type
Tipper
Tipper
Tipper
Tipper
Engine
8000 cc
8000 cc
NA
NA
Power
265 kW
240 kW
Power
400 HP to 443 H
Max Torque
1600 Nm
1300 Nm
2400 Nm
2400 Nm
Mileage
2.5 to 3.5 km/l
2.25-3.25 kmpl
NA
NA
Gross Vehicle Weight
54998 kg
35000 kg
-
-
Payload
NA
NA
55000 Kgs
40000 Kgs
No. of Tyres
10
12
10
6
Fuel Type
Diesel
Diesel
Electric
Electric
Fuel Tank Capacity
375 Ltr
300 Ltr
NA
NA
Max Speed
80 Km/h
80 Km/h
80 Km/h
80 Km/h
Gear Box
9 Forward +1 Reverse, 15409 synchromesh
9 Forward + 1 Reverse, 1315 synchromesh
6+1 Speed Auto Shift e-G Box with PTO Provision
4 F+1 R Speed Auto Shift e-G box with PTO Provision
Chassis Type
Chassis with Cabin
Chassis with Cabin
Chassis with Cabin
Chassis with Cabin
Performance14 specs
Max Power
265 kW
240 kW
-
-
Engine Displacement (cc)
8000 cc
8000 cc
-
-
Fuel Tank (Litres)
375 Ltr
300 Ltr
-
-
Engine
A-series, 8.L capacity
8.0 L A-series 6-cylinder engine
-
-
Fuel Type
Diesel
Diesel
Electric
Electric
Emission Norms
BS-VI
-
Zero Tailpipe
Zero Tailpipe
Max Torque
1600 Nm
1300 Nm
2400 Nm
2400 Nm
Engine Cylinders
6
6
-
-
Turning Radius (mm)
14300
18940
-
-
Battery Capacity
150 Ah
150 Ah
-
-
Carrier Type
Goods Carrier
Goods Carrier
-
-
Product Type
L5N (High Speed Goods Carrier)
L5N (High Speed Goods Carrier)
-
-
Gradeability (%)
-
-
28-58 %
28-58 %
Type of Motor
-
-
PMSM Motors
PMSM Motor
Dimension3 specs
Wheelbase (mm)
3900
5250
-
-
Axle Configuration
6 x 4
-
6x4
4x2
Size (Cu. M)
-
19
-
-
Transmission & Loading Capacity5 specs
Transmission
Manual
Manual
-
-
GVW / GCW (Kgs)
55000 kg
35000 kg
-
-
Gear Box
9 Forward +1 Reverse, 15409 synchromesh
9 Forward + 1 Reverse, 1315 synchromesh
6+1 Speed Auto Shift e-G Box with PTO Provision
4 F+1 R Speed Auto Shift e-G box with PTO Provision
Clutch
430 mm dia with air assisted hydraulic booster
430 mm dia.
-
-
Payload (Kgs)
-
-
55000 Kgs
40000 Kgs
Features14 specs
Navigation System
-
Seat Type
Standard
Standard
Standard
Standard
Driver Information Display
Adjustable Driver Seat
Seating Capacity
D+1
D+1
D + 2
D + 2
Seat Belts
Steering
-
-
Power Steering
Power Steering
A/C
-
-
Cruise Control
-
-
Telematics
-
-
Tiltable Steering
-
-
Arm-rest
-
-
Tubeless Tyres
-
-
Hill Hold
-
-
Brakes & Suspension7 specs
Brakes
Full air dual line
Full air dual line
-
-
Front Axle
Forged I section - reverse elliot type
Zero drop Forged I section - Reverse Elliot type Unitized wheel bearing only for Mining applications
-
-
Front Suspension
Parabolic leaf springs with shock absorber & anti roll bar
10.5T Parabolic leaf springs with shock absorber & anti roll bar
-
-
Rear Axle
Hub Reduction
Single reduction RAR
-
-
Rear Suspension
Bogie Suspension with rubber bolster & anti roll bar
Bogie Suspension with rubber bolster & anti roll bar
-
-
ABS
Parking Brakes
-
-
Body Option & Cabin Type4 specs
Chassis Type
Chassis with Cabin
Chassis with Cabin
Chassis with Cabin
Chassis with Cabin
Body Option
Customizable body
Rock body
Customizable body
Customizable body
Cabin Type
Sleeper cabin HVAC optional
TAURUS Day Cabin
Sleeper Cabin
Sleeper Cabin
Tiltable Cabin
-
Tyres3 specs
Number of Tyre
10
12
10
6
Rear Tyre
295/90R20
11R20 Radial / 12X20/12X24
-
-
Front Tyre
295/90R20
11R20 Radial / 12X20/12X24
-
-
Others3 specs
Chassis
Battery(Volts)
24 V
24 V
-
-
Fog Lights
-
Other Details3 specs
Usecase
Automobile transport, Bulk cargo movement, Construction
Bulk cargo movement, Construction, Mining
Construction Material Transport, Mining & Quarry Operations, Industrial Goods Transportation, Long-Haul Cargo Logistics
Construction Material Transport, Mining & Quarry Operations, Industrial Goods Transportation, Long-Haul Cargo Logistics
Charging Time
-
-
60 minutes
7 hours
Type Of Motor
-
-
PMSM Motors
PMSM Motor
Which to buy
Which One Fits Your Use Case?
Ashok Leyland HIPPO 5536 6x4
Best for:
- Automobile transport
- Bulk cargo movement
- Construction
Ashok Leyland TAURUS 3532 5250/19m3/Rock
Best for:
- Bulk cargo movement
- Construction
- Mining
I-BOARD Ductor 5525
Best for:
- Construction Material Transport
- Mining & Quarry Operations
- Industrial Goods Transportation
- Long-Haul Cargo Logistics
I-BOARD Long Haulage TT 5520
Best for:
- Construction Material Transport
- Mining & Quarry Operations
- Industrial Goods Transportation
- Long-Haul Cargo Logistics
FAQs
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has better power, Ashok Leyland HIPPO 5536 6x4 vs Ashok Leyland TAURUS 3532 5250/19m3/Rock vs I-BOARD Ductor 5525 vs I-BOARD Long Haulage TT 5520?
+−
I-BOARD Long Haulage TT 5520 has the better power at 400 HP.
Which has better mileage, Ashok Leyland HIPPO 5536 6x4 vs Ashok Leyland TAURUS 3532 5250/19m3/Rock vs I-BOARD Ductor 5525 vs I-BOARD Long Haulage TT 5520?
+−
Ashok Leyland HIPPO 5536 6x4 has the better mileage at 2.5 km/l.
Which has better payload, Ashok Leyland HIPPO 5536 6x4 vs Ashok Leyland TAURUS 3532 5250/19m3/Rock vs I-BOARD Ductor 5525 vs I-BOARD Long Haulage TT 5520?
+−
I-BOARD Ductor 5525 has the better payload at 55000 kg.
Which has better GVW, Ashok Leyland HIPPO 5536 6x4 vs Ashok Leyland TAURUS 3532 5250/19m3/Rock vs I-BOARD Ductor 5525 vs I-BOARD Long Haulage TT 5520?
+−
Ashok Leyland HIPPO 5536 6x4 has the better GVW at 54998 kg.
Which truck should I choose between Ashok Leyland HIPPO 5536 6x4 and Ashok Leyland TAURUS 3532 5250/19m3/Rock?
+−
Choose Ashok Leyland HIPPO 5536 6x4 if its price, body type, fuel type, and payload fit your route and loading needs better. Choose Ashok Leyland TAURUS 3532 5250/19m3/Rock if its specifications, service fit, or operating cost suits your business use case more closely.
What fuel types are available in Ashok Leyland HIPPO 5536 6x4 vs Ashok Leyland TAURUS 3532 5250/19m3/Rock vs I-BOARD Ductor 5525 vs I-BOARD Long Haulage TT 5520?
+−
Ashok Leyland HIPPO 5536 6x4 vs Ashok Leyland TAURUS 3532 5250/19m3/Rock vs I-BOARD Ductor 5525 vs I-BOARD Long Haulage TT 5520 include Diesel, Electric fuel options. Buyers should compare fuel availability, route distance, and daily running cost before finalizing a truck.
What body types are compared in Ashok Leyland HIPPO 5536 6x4 vs Ashok Leyland TAURUS 3532 5250/19m3/Rock vs I-BOARD Ductor 5525 vs I-BOARD Long Haulage TT 5520?
+−
This comparison includes Tipper body type. Match the body type with your cargo, loading pattern, and city or highway route requirement.
How do tyre configurations compare in Ashok Leyland HIPPO 5536 6x4 vs Ashok Leyland TAURUS 3532 5250/19m3/Rock vs I-BOARD Ductor 5525 vs I-BOARD Long Haulage TT 5520?
+−
Ashok Leyland HIPPO 5536 6x4 has 10 tyres, Ashok Leyland TAURUS 3532 5250/19m3/Rock has 12 tyres, I-BOARD Ductor 5525 has 10 tyres, I-BOARD Long Haulage TT 5520 has 6 tyres. Tyre configuration matters for load stability, operating conditions, and maintenance planning.