Truck Comparison
Atul GEM Cargo vs BABA Garbage Loader E Cart vs Piaggio Ape Xtra LDX Plus vs TVS King Kargo CNG HD 2310/Container: Price & Specs Comparison
BABA Garbage Loader E Cart is the more affordable option here by about ₹1,000. BABA Garbage Loader E Cart leads on mileage at 80 km/l. The compared trucks cover 3 Wheeler body type with CNG, Electric, Petrol fuel options.
This comparison uses the available truck data for Atul GEM Cargo vs BABA Garbage Loader E Cart vs Piaggio Ape Xtra LDX Plus vs TVS King Kargo CNG HD 2310/Container so you can check which model fits better for your budget, route, payload requirement, fuel preference, and daily business usage.
Body type: 3 Wheeler. Fuel options: CNG, Electric, Petrol. Tyres: 3. Payload: Atul GEM Cargo: 500 Kgs | BABA Garbage Loader E Cart: 265 Kgs | Piaggio Ape Xtra LDX Plus: 532 Kgs | TVS King Kargo CNG HD 2310/Container: NA.
Review all available price, mileage, power, torque, GVW, body type, tyres, gearbox, chassis, and extra specification details below before shortlisting a model.
Compare
Add Trucks to Compare
Details
Full Truck Details
Key Specifications16 specs
Price
₹2.66 L
₹2.65 L
₹2.55 L - ₹2.66 L
₹2.71 L
Brand
atul
baba
piaggio
tvs
Model
Atul GEM Cargo
BABA Garbage Loader E Cart
Piaggio Ape Xtra LDX Plus
TVS King Kargo CNG HD 2310/Container
Body Type
3 Wheeler
3 Wheeler
3 Wheeler
3 Wheeler
Engine
395 cc
NA
305.2 cc
301.1 cc
Power
9 hp
1 hp
11.9 hp
9.1 kW
Max Torque
23 Nm
NA
24 Nm
22.4 Nm
Mileage
30.4 kmpl
80 KM/Full Charge
36 kmpl
36 km/kg
Gross Vehicle Weight
1020 kg
600 kg
975 kg
998 kg
Payload
500 Kgs
265 Kgs
532 Kgs
NA
No. of Tyres
3
3
3
3
Fuel Type
CNG
Electric
Petrol
CNG
Fuel Tank Capacity
40 Ltr
140 Ah
9.5 Ltr
40 litre (CNG) + 3 litre (Petrol) Ltr
Max Speed
25 Km/h
35 km/h
60 Km/h
62
Gear Box
4 Forward + 1 Reverse
1 Forward + 1 Reverse
5 Forward + 1 Reverse
4 forward + 1 Reverse
Chassis Type
Chassis with Cabin
Chassis with Cabin
Chassis with Cabin
Chassis with Cabin
Dimension9 specs
Overall Length (mm)
3480
2720
3295
3565
Overall Width (mm)
1550
980
1490
1530
Overall Height (mm)
1830
1780
1770
1860
Ground Clearance (mm)
255
250
245
235
Wheelbase (mm)
2260
2095
2100
2310
Axle Configuration
3x3
3x3
3x3
-
Loading Length {mm}
2005
-
1800
-
Loading Width {mm}
1550
-
1400
-
Loading Height {mm}
360
-
285
-
Transmission & Loading Capacity7 specs
Transmission
Manual
Automatic
Constant mesh
Manual
Payload (Kgs)
500 Kgs
265 Kgs
532 Kgs
-
GVW / GCW (Kgs)
1020 kg
600 kg
975 kg
998 kg
Kerb Weight (Kgs)
520
335
492
573
Gear Box
4 Forward + 1 Reverse
1 Forward + 1 Reverse
4 Forward + 1 Reverse
4 forward + 1 Reverse
Clutch
Wet Multiplate Type
-
Multi Disc Wet Type
Assisted slipper clutch mechanism
Power Steering
Features14 specs
Steering
Handle bar type
Handle bar type
Handle bar type
Handle bar type
A/C
Cruise Control
Navigation System
Telematics
Tiltable Steering
Arm-rest
Seat Type
Standard
Standard
Standard
Standard
Driver Information Display
Adjustable Driver Seat
Seating Capacity
Driver Only
Driver Only
Driver Only
Driver Only
Tubeless Tyres
Seat Belts
Hill Hold
Brakes & Suspension7 specs
Brakes
Hydraulic Drum Brakes
Drum Brake
Drum Brake Hydraulic Actuated Internal Expanding Shoe Type
Hydraulic Drum Brakes
Front Axle
Rigid front axle
-
-
-
Front Suspension
Hydraulic Telescopic Double Acting, Helical Compression Spring and Damper
Helical Spring + Dampener + Hydraulic Shock Absorber
Hydraulic telescopic shock absorber with Helical spring & dampener
Single Fork Leading Link Coil Spring
Rear Axle
Live rear axle
-
-
-
Rear Suspension
Hydraulic Telescopic Double Acting, Heavy duty Spring Rubber Spring and Damper
Rigid axle with leaf spring
Hydraulic telescopic shock absorber with Rubber spring & dampener
Leaf Spring with Hydraulic Damper (Parabolic type)
ABS
Parking Brakes
-
Body Option & Cabin Type4 specs
Chassis Type
Monocoque Chassis
Chassis with Cabin
Chassis with Cabin
Chassis with Cabin
Body Option
Deck Body
Box body
Deck Body
Box body
Cabin Type
Day Cabin
Day Cabin
Day Cabin
Day Cabin
Tiltable Cabin
Tyres3 specs
Number of Tyre
3
3
3
3
Rear Tyre
4.5-10-8 PR
3x75x12
4.50-10, 8 PR
130/80R12 90F Radial
Front Tyre
4.5-10-8 PR
3x75x12
4.50-10, 8 PR
130/80R12 90F Radial
Others3 specs
Chassis
Battery(Volts)
12 V
12 V
12 V
-
Fog Lights
Performance18 specs
Max Power
-
1 hp
9.59 hp
9.1 kW
Fuel Type
-
Electric
CNG
CNG
Emission Norms
-
Zero Tailpipe
BS-VI
-
Gradeability (%)
-
20 %
23.8 %
24.93 %
Max Speed (km/h)
-
35
56
62
Turning Radius (mm)
-
3400
4200
3420
Range
-
80
-
-
Battery Capacity
-
140 Ah
50 Ah
-
Type of Motor
-
BLDC Motor
-
-
Product Type
-
L3N (Low Speed Goods Carrier)
L3N (Low Speed Goods Carrier)
L5N (High Speed Goods Carrier)
Carrier Type
-
Goods Carrier
Goods Carrier
Goods Carrier
Engine Displacement (cc)
-
-
230.7 cc
301.1 cc
Fuel Tank (Litres)
-
-
CNG 40 / Petrol 2.8 Ltr
40 litre (CNG) + 3 litre (Petrol) Ltr
Engine
-
-
Single cylinder, Naturally Aspirated, Water Cooled, Direct Injection,Electronic Fuel Injection
Four stoke - Spark Ignition - Liquid cooled
Max Torque
-
-
16.54 Nm
22.4 Nm
Mileage
-
-
36 kmpl
-
Engine Cylinders
-
-
1
-
CNG Mileage
-
-
-
36 km/kg
Charging1 specs
Charging Time
-
5-7 Hours
-
-
Other Details4 specs
Charging Time
No
5-7 Hours
No
-
Type Of Motor
No
BLDC Motor
No
-
Rating
4.5
-
4.5
-
Usecase
Small business logistics
Small business logistics
Logistics
Small business logistics, Last-mile delivery
Which to buy
Which One Fits Your Use Case?
FAQs
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, Atul GEM Cargo vs BABA Garbage Loader E Cart vs Piaggio Ape Xtra LDX Plus vs TVS King Kargo CNG HD 2310/Container?
+−
BABA Garbage Loader E Cart has the lower price among these options.
Which has better power, Atul GEM Cargo vs BABA Garbage Loader E Cart vs Piaggio Ape Xtra LDX Plus vs TVS King Kargo CNG HD 2310/Container?
+−
Piaggio Ape Xtra LDX Plus has the better power at 11.9 HP.
Which has better torque, Atul GEM Cargo vs BABA Garbage Loader E Cart vs Piaggio Ape Xtra LDX Plus vs TVS King Kargo CNG HD 2310/Container?
+−
Piaggio Ape Xtra LDX Plus has the better torque at 24.
Which has better mileage, Atul GEM Cargo vs BABA Garbage Loader E Cart vs Piaggio Ape Xtra LDX Plus vs TVS King Kargo CNG HD 2310/Container?
+−
BABA Garbage Loader E Cart has the better mileage at 80 km/l.
Which has better payload, Atul GEM Cargo vs BABA Garbage Loader E Cart vs Piaggio Ape Xtra LDX Plus vs TVS King Kargo CNG HD 2310/Container?
+−
Piaggio Ape Xtra LDX Plus has the better payload at 532 kg.
Which has better GVW, Atul GEM Cargo vs BABA Garbage Loader E Cart vs Piaggio Ape Xtra LDX Plus vs TVS King Kargo CNG HD 2310/Container?
+−
Atul GEM Cargo has the better GVW at 1020 kg.
Which truck should I choose between Atul GEM Cargo and BABA Garbage Loader E Cart?
+−
Choose Atul GEM Cargo if its price, body type, fuel type, and payload fit your route and loading needs better. Choose BABA Garbage Loader E Cart if its specifications, service fit, or operating cost suits your business use case more closely.
What fuel types are available in Atul GEM Cargo vs BABA Garbage Loader E Cart vs Piaggio Ape Xtra LDX Plus vs TVS King Kargo CNG HD 2310/Container?
+−
Atul GEM Cargo vs BABA Garbage Loader E Cart vs Piaggio Ape Xtra LDX Plus vs TVS King Kargo CNG HD 2310/Container include CNG, Electric, Petrol fuel options. Buyers should compare fuel availability, route distance, and daily running cost before finalizing a truck.
What body types are compared in Atul GEM Cargo vs BABA Garbage Loader E Cart vs Piaggio Ape Xtra LDX Plus vs TVS King Kargo CNG HD 2310/Container?
+−
This comparison includes 3 Wheeler body type. Match the body type with your cargo, loading pattern, and city or highway route requirement.
How do tyre configurations compare in Atul GEM Cargo vs BABA Garbage Loader E Cart vs Piaggio Ape Xtra LDX Plus vs TVS King Kargo CNG HD 2310/Container?
+−
Atul GEM Cargo has 3 tyres, BABA Garbage Loader E Cart has 3 tyres, Piaggio Ape Xtra LDX Plus has 3 tyres, TVS King Kargo CNG HD 2310/Container has 3 tyres. Tyre configuration matters for load stability, operating conditions, and maintenance planning.