Truck Comparison

Atul GEM Cargo vs BABA Garbage Loader E Cart vs Piaggio Ape Xtra LDX Plus vs TVS King Kargo ZK Fi PF-4S CNG: Price & Specs Comparison

BABA Garbage Loader E Cart is the more affordable option here by about ₹1,000. BABA Garbage Loader E Cart leads on mileage at 80 km/l. The compared trucks cover 3 Wheeler body type with CNG, Electric, Petrol fuel options.

This comparison uses the available truck data for Atul GEM Cargo vs BABA Garbage Loader E Cart vs Piaggio Ape Xtra LDX Plus vs TVS King Kargo ZK Fi PF-4S CNG so you can check which model fits better for your budget, route, payload requirement, fuel preference, and daily business usage.

Body type: 3 Wheeler. Fuel options: CNG, Electric, Petrol. Tyres: 3. Payload: Atul GEM Cargo: 500 Kgs | BABA Garbage Loader E Cart: 265 Kgs | Piaggio Ape Xtra LDX Plus: 532 Kgs | TVS King Kargo ZK Fi PF-4S CNG: 426 Kgs.

Review all available price, mileage, power, torque, GVW, body type, tyres, gearbox, chassis, and extra specification details below before shortlisting a model.

Compare

Add Trucks to Compare

Details

Full Truck Details

Specs
This TruckAtul GEM Cargo

₹2.66 L

Piaggio Ape Xtra LDX Plus

₹2.55 L - ₹2.66 L

TVS King Kargo ZK Fi PF-4S CNG

₹2.45 L - ₹2.69 L

Key Specifications
Price
₹2.66 L
₹2.65 L
₹2.55 L - ₹2.66 L
₹2.45 L - ₹2.69 L
Brand
atul
baba
piaggio
tvs
Model
Atul GEM Cargo
BABA Garbage Loader E Cart
Piaggio Ape Xtra LDX Plus
TVS King Kargo ZK Fi PF-4S CNG
Body Type
3 Wheeler
3 Wheeler
3 Wheeler
3 Wheeler
Engine
395 cc
NA
305.2 cc
225.8 cc
Power
9 hp
1 hp
11.9 hp
6.7 kw
Max Torque
23 Nm
NA
24 Nm
15.5 Nm
Mileage
30.4 kmpl
80 KM/Full Charge
36 kmpl
43 Kmpl
Gross Vehicle Weight
1020 kg
600 kg
975 kg
864 kg
Payload
500 Kgs
265 Kgs
532 Kgs
426 Kgs
No. of Tyres
3
3
3
3
Fuel Type
CNG
Electric
Petrol
CNG
Fuel Tank Capacity
40 Ltr
140 Ah
9.5 Ltr
28/30 Petrol-3 Ltr
Max Speed
25 Km/h
35 km/h
60 Km/h
60 Km/h
Gear Box
4 Forward + 1 Reverse
1 Forward + 1 Reverse
5 Forward + 1 Reverse
4 Forward + 1 Reverse
Chassis Type
Chassis with Cabin
Chassis with Cabin
Chassis with Cabin
Semi Monocoque
Dimension
Overall Length (mm)
3480
2720
3295
2647
Overall Width (mm)
1550
980
1490
1329
Overall Height (mm)
1830
1780
1770
1740
Ground Clearance (mm)
255
250
245
169
Wheelbase (mm)
2260
2095
2100
1990
Axle Configuration
3x3
3x3
3x3
3x3
Loading Length {mm}
2005
-
1800
1500
Loading Width {mm}
1550
-
1400
1300
Loading Height {mm}
360
-
285
-
Transmission & Loading Capacity
Transmission
Manual
Automatic
Constant mesh
Manual
Payload (Kgs)
500 Kgs
265 Kgs
532 Kgs
426 Kgs
GVW / GCW (Kgs)
1020 kg
600 kg
975 kg
864 kg
Kerb Weight (Kgs)
520
335
492
438
Gear Box
4 Forward + 1 Reverse
1 Forward + 1 Reverse
4 Forward + 1 Reverse
4 Forward + 1 Reverse
Clutch
Wet Multiplate Type
-
Multi Disc Wet Type
Constant Mesh, Fork & Cam Type Shift Mechanism
Power Steering
Features
Steering
Handle bar type
Handle bar type
Handle bar type
Handle bar type
A/C
Cruise Control
Navigation System
Telematics
Tiltable Steering
Arm-rest
Seat Type
Standard
Standard
Standard
Standard
Driver Information Display
Adjustable Driver Seat
Seating Capacity
Driver Only
Driver Only
Driver Only
Driver Only
Tubeless Tyres
Seat Belts
Hill Hold
Brakes & Suspension
Brakes
Hydraulic Drum Brakes
Drum Brake
Drum Brake Hydraulic Actuated Internal Expanding Shoe Type
Hydraulic Drum Brakes
Front Axle
Rigid front axle
-
-
-
Front Suspension
Hydraulic Telescopic Double Acting, Helical Compression Spring and Damper
Helical Spring + Dampener + Hydraulic Shock Absorber
Hydraulic telescopic shock absorber with Helical spring & dampener
Swing Arm with Hydraulic Damper & Coil Spring
Rear Axle
Live rear axle
-
-
-
Rear Suspension
Hydraulic Telescopic Double Acting, Heavy duty Spring Rubber Spring and Damper
Rigid axle with leaf spring
Hydraulic telescopic shock absorber with Rubber spring & dampener
Swing Arm with Hydraulic Damper & Coil Spring
ABS
Parking Brakes
Body Option & Cabin Type
Chassis Type
Monocoque Chassis
Chassis with Cabin
Chassis with Cabin
Semi Monocoque
Body Option
Deck Body
Box body
Deck Body
Deck Body
Cabin Type
Day Cabin
Day Cabin
Day Cabin
Day Cabin
Tiltable Cabin
Tyres
Number of Tyre
3
3
3
3
Rear Tyre
4.5-10-8 PR
3x75x12
4.50-10, 8 PR
4.00 - 8,76F 6 PR
Front Tyre
4.5-10-8 PR
3x75x12
4.50-10, 8 PR
4.00 - 8,76F 6 PR
Others
Chassis
Battery(Volts)
12 V
12 V
12 V
12 V
Fog Lights
Loading Platform Area(Sq.ft)
-
-
-
21.74
Performance
Max Power
-
1 hp
9.59 hp
6.7 kW
Fuel Type
-
Electric
CNG
CNG
Emission Norms
-
Zero Tailpipe
BS-VI
BS-VI
Gradeability (%)
-
20 %
23.8 %
10 %
Max Speed (km/h)
-
35
56
60
Turning Radius (mm)
-
3400
4200
-
Range
-
80
-
-
Battery Capacity
-
140 Ah
50 Ah
32 Ah
Type of Motor
-
BLDC Motor
-
-
Product Type
-
L3N (Low Speed Goods Carrier)
L3N (Low Speed Goods Carrier)
L3N (Low Speed Goods Carrier)
Carrier Type
-
Goods Carrier
Goods Carrier
Goods Carrier
Engine Displacement (cc)
-
-
230.7 cc
225.8 cc
Fuel Tank (Litres)
-
-
CNG 40 / Petrol 2.8 Ltr
28/30 Petrol-3 Ltr
Engine
-
-
Single cylinder, Naturally Aspirated, Water Cooled, Direct Injection,Electronic Fuel Injection
4-stroke, single-cylinder, liquid-cooled, EFI
Max Torque
-
-
16.54 Nm
15.5 Nm
Mileage
-
-
36 kmpl
43 kmpl
Engine Cylinders
-
-
1
1
Mileage City
-
-
-
25-30
Mileage Highway
-
-
-
30-35
Charging
Charging Time
-
5-7 Hours
-
-
Other Details
Charging Time
No
5-7 Hours
No
No
Type Of Motor
No
BLDC Motor
No
No
Rating
4.5
-
4.5
4.5
Usecase
Small business logistics
Small business logistics
Logistics
Logistics

Which to buy

Which One Fits Your Use Case?

FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Atul GEM Cargo vs BABA Garbage Loader E Cart vs Piaggio Ape Xtra LDX Plus vs TVS King Kargo ZK Fi PF-4S CNG?

+
BABA Garbage Loader E Cart has the lower price among these options.

Which has better power, Atul GEM Cargo vs BABA Garbage Loader E Cart vs Piaggio Ape Xtra LDX Plus vs TVS King Kargo ZK Fi PF-4S CNG?

+
Piaggio Ape Xtra LDX Plus has the better power at 11.9 HP.

Which has better torque, Atul GEM Cargo vs BABA Garbage Loader E Cart vs Piaggio Ape Xtra LDX Plus vs TVS King Kargo ZK Fi PF-4S CNG?

+
Piaggio Ape Xtra LDX Plus has the better torque at 24.

Which has better mileage, Atul GEM Cargo vs BABA Garbage Loader E Cart vs Piaggio Ape Xtra LDX Plus vs TVS King Kargo ZK Fi PF-4S CNG?

+
BABA Garbage Loader E Cart has the better mileage at 80 km/l.

Which has better payload, Atul GEM Cargo vs BABA Garbage Loader E Cart vs Piaggio Ape Xtra LDX Plus vs TVS King Kargo ZK Fi PF-4S CNG?

+
Piaggio Ape Xtra LDX Plus has the better payload at 532 kg.

Which has better GVW, Atul GEM Cargo vs BABA Garbage Loader E Cart vs Piaggio Ape Xtra LDX Plus vs TVS King Kargo ZK Fi PF-4S CNG?

+
Atul GEM Cargo has the better GVW at 1020 kg.

Which truck should I choose between Atul GEM Cargo and BABA Garbage Loader E Cart?

+
Choose Atul GEM Cargo if its price, body type, fuel type, and payload fit your route and loading needs better. Choose BABA Garbage Loader E Cart if its specifications, service fit, or operating cost suits your business use case more closely.

What fuel types are available in Atul GEM Cargo vs BABA Garbage Loader E Cart vs Piaggio Ape Xtra LDX Plus vs TVS King Kargo ZK Fi PF-4S CNG?

+
Atul GEM Cargo vs BABA Garbage Loader E Cart vs Piaggio Ape Xtra LDX Plus vs TVS King Kargo ZK Fi PF-4S CNG include CNG, Electric, Petrol fuel options. Buyers should compare fuel availability, route distance, and daily running cost before finalizing a truck.

What body types are compared in Atul GEM Cargo vs BABA Garbage Loader E Cart vs Piaggio Ape Xtra LDX Plus vs TVS King Kargo ZK Fi PF-4S CNG?

+
This comparison includes 3 Wheeler body type. Match the body type with your cargo, loading pattern, and city or highway route requirement.

How do tyre configurations compare in Atul GEM Cargo vs BABA Garbage Loader E Cart vs Piaggio Ape Xtra LDX Plus vs TVS King Kargo ZK Fi PF-4S CNG?

+
Atul GEM Cargo has 3 tyres, BABA Garbage Loader E Cart has 3 tyres, Piaggio Ape Xtra LDX Plus has 3 tyres, TVS King Kargo ZK Fi PF-4S CNG has 3 tyres. Tyre configuration matters for load stability, operating conditions, and maintenance planning.