Truck Comparison
Atul Gem Paxx vs Atul RIK PLUS vs Atul RIK PLUS 3-Seater/1950/CNG vs JSA NV CNG Passenger: Price & Specs Comparison
Atul Gem Paxx is the more affordable option here by about ₹3,000. Atul Gem Paxx leads on power at 9.38 HP. The compared trucks cover Auto Rickshaw body type with CNG fuel option.
This comparison uses the available truck data for Atul Gem Paxx vs Atul RIK PLUS vs Atul RIK PLUS 3-Seater/1950/CNG vs JSA NV CNG Passenger so you can check which model fits better for your budget, route, payload requirement, fuel preference, and daily business usage.
Body type: Auto Rickshaw. Fuel option: CNG. Tyres: 3. Payload: Atul Gem Paxx: NA | Atul RIK PLUS: NA | Atul RIK PLUS 3-Seater/1950/CNG: NA | JSA NV CNG Passenger: NA.
Review all available price, mileage, power, torque, GVW, body type, tyres, gearbox, chassis, and extra specification details below before shortlisting a model.
Compare
Add Trucks to Compare
Details
Full Truck Details
Key Specifications16 specs
Price
₹2.66 L
₹2.71 L
₹2.71 L
₹2.65 L - ₹2.69 L
Brand
atul
atul
atul
jsa
Model
Atul Gem Paxx
Atul RIK PLUS
Atul RIK PLUS 3-Seater/1950/CNG
JSA NV CNG Passenger
Body Type
Auto Rickshaw
Auto Rickshaw
Auto Rickshaw
Auto Rickshaw
Engine
395 cc
198.6 cc
198.6 cc
G 400 W VI CNG
Power
9.38 hp
6.75 kw
6.75 kW
7 hp
Max Torque
23 Nm
13.35 Nm
13.35 Nm
23.5 Nm
Mileage
36 Kmpl
45 kmpl
45 kmpl
30 km/kg
Gross Vehicle Weight
849 kg
804 kg
804 kg
800 kg
Payload
NA
NA
NA
NA
No. of Tyres
3
3
3
3
Fuel Type
CNG
CNG
CNG
CNG
Fuel Tank Capacity
CNG 40 / Petrol 2.8 Ltr
Water 40 / 2.9 Petrol Ltr
Water 40 / 2.9 Petrol Ltr
40 Ltr
Max Speed
60 Km/h
60 Km/h
60 Km/h
50 km/h
Gear Box
4 Forward + 1 Reverse
4 Forward + 1 Reverse
4 Forward + 1 Reverse
Constant Mesh
Chassis Type
Monocoque Pressed Section
Monocoque Chasis
Monocoque Chasis
Chassis with Cabin
Performance17 specs
Max Power
9.38 hp
6.75 kW
6.75 kW
7 hp
Engine Displacement (cc)
395 cc
198.6 cc
198.6 cc
-
Fuel Tank (Litres)
CNG 40 / Petrol 2.8 Ltr
Water 40 / 2.9 Petrol Ltr
Water 40 / 2.9 Petrol Ltr
40 Ltr
Engine
Four Stroke, Single Cylinder, Spark Ignition, Water Cooled
Single Cylinder 4 Stroke, Air Cooled
Single Cylinder 4 Stroke, Air Cooled
G 400 W VI CNG
Fuel Type
CNG
CNG
CNG
CNG
Emission Norms
BS-VI
BS-VI
BS-VI
BS-VI
Max Torque
23 Nm
13.35 Nm
13.35 Nm
23.5 Nm
Mileage
36 kmpl
45 kmpl
45 kmpl
-
Gradeability (%)
10 %
26.7 %
26.7 %
-
Max Speed (km/h)
60
60
60
50
Engine Cylinders
1
1
1
-
Turning Radius (mm)
2500
2076
2076
-
Battery Capacity
100 Ah
35 Ah
35 Ah
-
Product Type
L3M (Low Speed Passenger Carrier)
L3M (Low Speed Passenger Carrier)
L3M (Low Speed Passenger Carrier)
L3M (Low Speed Passenger Carrier)
Carrier Type
Passenger Carrier
Passenger Carrier
Passenger Carrier
Passenger Carrier
Type of Motor
-
BLDC Motor
BLDC Motor
-
Engine Displacement (cm3)
-
-
-
395
Dimension6 specs
Overall Length (mm)
2990
2810
2810
2950
Overall Width (mm)
1460
1390
1390
1450
Overall Height (mm)
1830
1858
1858
1800
Ground Clearance (mm)
255
220
220
155
Wheelbase (mm)
1925
1950
1950
1950
Axle Configuration
3x3
3x3
3x3
3x3
Transmission & Loading Capacity6 specs
Transmission
Constant mesh
Manual
Manual
Manual
GVW / GCW (Kgs)
849 kg
804 kg
804 kg
800 kg
Kerb Weight (Kgs)
529
484
484
500
Gear Box
4 Forward + 1 Reverse
4 Forward + 1 Reverse
4 Forward + 1 Reverse
Constant Mesh
Clutch
Wet Multiplate Clutch
Mulit Plate Wet Type
Mulit Plate Wet Type
Wet Multiplate
Power Steering
Features14 specs
Steering
Handle bar type
Handle bar type
Handle bar type
Handle bar type
A/C
Cruise Control
Navigation System
Telematics
Tiltable Steering
Arm-rest
Seat Type
Standard
Standard
Standard
Standard
Driver Information Display
Adjustable Driver Seat
Seating Capacity
D+3 Passenger
D+3 Passenger
D+3 Passenger
D+3 Passenger
Tubeless Tyres
Seat Belts
Hill Hold
Brakes & Suspension7 specs
Brakes
Drum brake, Dual circuit, Hydraulic, Front & Rear combined with TMC
Drum Type, Dual circuit, Hydraulic combined with TMC
Drum Type, Dual circuit, Hydraulic combined with TMC
Drum Brakes
Front Axle
Rigid front axle
Drum type, Dual circuit, Hydraulic front & Rear combined with TMC
Drum type, Dual circuit, Hydraulic front & Rear combined with TMC
-
Front Suspension
Hydraulic Telescopic Double Acting, Helical Compression Spring and Damper
Fork Type with Double Helical Compression coil Spring with Telescopic Shock absorber
Fork Type with Double Helical Compression coil Spring with Telescopic Shock absorber
Coil Spring
Rear Suspension
Hydraulic Telescopic Double Acting, Heavy duty Spring Rubber Spring and Damper
Trailing Arm, Helical Compression coil Spring with Telescopic Shock absorber
Trailing Arm, Helical Compression coil Spring with Telescopic Shock absorber
Rubber Damper
ABS
Parking Brakes
Rear Axle
-
Drum type, Dual circuit, Hydraulic front & Rear combined with TMC
Drum type, Dual circuit, Hydraulic front & Rear combined with TMC
-
Body Option & Cabin Type4 specs
Chassis Type
Monocoque Pressed Section
Monocoque Chasis
Monocoque Chasis
Chassis with Cabin
Body Option
Fuliy Bulit
Fully Built
Fully Built
Fully Built
Cabin Type
Day Cabin
Day Cabin
Day Cabin
Day Cabin
Tiltable Cabin
-
Tyres3 specs
Number of Tyre
3
3
3
3
Rear Tyre
4.5-10-8 PR
4.00 - 10, 6 PR
4.00 - 10, 6 PR
4.50 - 10, 8 PR
Front Tyre
4.5-10-8 PR
4.00 - 10, 6 PR
4.00 - 10, 6 PR
4.50 - 10, 8 PR
Others4 specs
Chassis
Loading Platform Area(Sq.ft)
27.08
1000
1000
-
Battery(Volts)
12 V Multi Plate Lead Acid
12 V
12 V
12 V
Fog Lights
Other Details4 specs
Charging Time
No
No
No
No
Type Of Motor
No
No
No
No
Rating
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.7
Usecase
Transport
Transport
Intercity transport of goods
logistics
Which to buy
Which One Fits Your Use Case?
FAQs
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, Atul Gem Paxx vs Atul RIK PLUS vs Atul RIK PLUS 3-Seater/1950/CNG vs JSA NV CNG Passenger?
+−
Atul Gem Paxx has the lower price among these options.
Which has better power, Atul Gem Paxx vs Atul RIK PLUS vs Atul RIK PLUS 3-Seater/1950/CNG vs JSA NV CNG Passenger?
+−
Atul Gem Paxx has the better power at 9.38 HP.
Which has better torque, Atul Gem Paxx vs Atul RIK PLUS vs Atul RIK PLUS 3-Seater/1950/CNG vs JSA NV CNG Passenger?
+−
JSA NV CNG Passenger has the better torque at 23.5.
Which has better GVW, Atul Gem Paxx vs Atul RIK PLUS vs Atul RIK PLUS 3-Seater/1950/CNG vs JSA NV CNG Passenger?
+−
Atul Gem Paxx has the better GVW at 849 kg.
Which truck should I choose between Atul Gem Paxx and Atul RIK PLUS?
+−
Choose Atul Gem Paxx if its price, body type, fuel type, and payload fit your route and loading needs better. Choose Atul RIK PLUS if its specifications, service fit, or operating cost suits your business use case more closely.
What fuel types are available in Atul Gem Paxx vs Atul RIK PLUS vs Atul RIK PLUS 3-Seater/1950/CNG vs JSA NV CNG Passenger?
+−
Atul Gem Paxx vs Atul RIK PLUS vs Atul RIK PLUS 3-Seater/1950/CNG vs JSA NV CNG Passenger include CNG fuel option. Buyers should compare fuel availability, route distance, and daily running cost before finalizing a truck.
What body types are compared in Atul Gem Paxx vs Atul RIK PLUS vs Atul RIK PLUS 3-Seater/1950/CNG vs JSA NV CNG Passenger?
+−
This comparison includes Auto Rickshaw body type. Match the body type with your cargo, loading pattern, and city or highway route requirement.
How do tyre configurations compare in Atul Gem Paxx vs Atul RIK PLUS vs Atul RIK PLUS 3-Seater/1950/CNG vs JSA NV CNG Passenger?
+−
Atul Gem Paxx has 3 tyres, Atul RIK PLUS has 3 tyres, Atul RIK PLUS 3-Seater/1950/CNG has 3 tyres, JSA NV CNG Passenger has 3 tyres. Tyre configuration matters for load stability, operating conditions, and maintenance planning.