TruckOnWheelsTruckOnWheels

Truck Comparison

Atul Gem Paxx vs Atul RIK PLUS vs JSA NV CNG Passenger vs JSA NV CNG Passenger 1950/3 Seater/CNG: Price & Specs Comparison

Atul Gem Paxx is the more affordable option here by about ₹3,000. Atul Gem Paxx leads on power at 9.38 HP. The compared trucks cover Auto Rickshaw body type with CNG fuel option.

This comparison uses the available truck data for Atul Gem Paxx vs Atul RIK PLUS vs JSA NV CNG Passenger vs JSA NV CNG Passenger 1950/3 Seater/CNG so you can check which model fits better for your budget, route, payload requirement, fuel preference, and daily business usage.

Body type: Auto Rickshaw. Fuel option: CNG. Tyres: 3. Payload: Atul Gem Paxx: NA | Atul RIK PLUS: NA | JSA NV CNG Passenger: NA | JSA NV CNG Passenger 1950/3 Seater/CNG: No.

Review all available price, mileage, power, torque, GVW, body type, tyres, gearbox, chassis, and extra specification details below before shortlisting a model.

Compare

Add Trucks to Compare

Details

Full Truck Details

Specs
This TruckAtul Gem Paxx

₹2.66 L

Atul RIK PLUS

₹2.71 L

JSA NV CNG Passenger

₹2.65 L - ₹2.69 L

JSA NV CNG Passenger 1950/3 Seater/CNG

₹2.65 L - ₹2.69 L

Key Specifications
Price
₹2.66 L
₹2.71 L
₹2.65 L - ₹2.69 L
₹2.65 L - ₹2.69 L
Brand
atul
atul
jsa
jsa
Model
Atul Gem Paxx
Atul RIK PLUS
JSA NV CNG Passenger
JSA NV CNG Passenger 1950/3 Seater/CNG
Body Type
Auto Rickshaw
Auto Rickshaw
Auto Rickshaw
Auto Rickshaw
Engine
395 cc
198.6 cc
G 400 W VI CNG
395 cc
Power
9.38 hp
6.75 kw
7 hp
7 hp
Max Torque
23 Nm
13.35 Nm
23.5 Nm
23.5 Nm
Mileage
36 Kmpl
45 kmpl
30 km/kg
30 km/kg
Gross Vehicle Weight
849 kg
804 kg
800 kg
800 kg
Payload
NA
NA
NA
No
No. of Tyres
3
3
3
3
Fuel Type
CNG
CNG
CNG
CNG
Fuel Tank Capacity
CNG 40 / Petrol 2.8 Ltr
Water 40 / 2.9 Petrol Ltr
40 Ltr
40 Ltr
Max Speed
60 Km/h
60 Km/h
50 km/h
50 km/h
Gear Box
4 Forward + 1 Reverse
4 Forward + 1 Reverse
Constant Mesh
Constant Mesh
Chassis Type
Monocoque Pressed Section
Monocoque Chasis
Chassis with Cabin
Chassis with Cabin
Performance
Max Power
9.38 hp
6.75 kW
7 hp
-
Engine Displacement (cc)
395 cc
198.6 cc
-
-
Fuel Tank (Litres)
CNG 40 / Petrol 2.8 Ltr
Water 40 / 2.9 Petrol Ltr
40 Ltr
-
Engine
Four Stroke, Single Cylinder, Spark Ignition, Water Cooled
Single Cylinder 4 Stroke, Air Cooled
G 400 W VI CNG
-
Fuel Type
CNG
CNG
CNG
-
Emission Norms
BS-VI
BS-VI
BS-VI
-
Max Torque
23 Nm
13.35 Nm
23.5 Nm
-
Mileage
36 kmpl
45 kmpl
-
-
Gradeability (%)
10 %
26.7 %
-
-
Max Speed (km/h)
60
60
50
-
Engine Cylinders
1
1
-
-
Turning Radius (mm)
2500
2076
-
-
Battery Capacity
100 Ah
35 Ah
-
-
Product Type
L3M (Low Speed Passenger Carrier)
L3M (Low Speed Passenger Carrier)
L3M (Low Speed Passenger Carrier)
-
Carrier Type
Passenger Carrier
Passenger Carrier
Passenger Carrier
-
Type of Motor
-
BLDC Motor
-
-
Engine Displacement (cm3)
-
-
395
-
Dimension
Overall Length (mm)
2990
2810
2950
-
Overall Width (mm)
1460
1390
1450
-
Overall Height (mm)
1830
1858
1800
-
Ground Clearance (mm)
255
220
155
-
Wheelbase (mm)
1925
1950
1950
-
Axle Configuration
3x3
3x3
3x3
-
Transmission & Loading Capacity
Transmission
Constant mesh
Manual
Manual
-
GVW / GCW (Kgs)
849 kg
804 kg
800 kg
-
Kerb Weight (Kgs)
529
484
500
-
Gear Box
4 Forward + 1 Reverse
4 Forward + 1 Reverse
Constant Mesh
-
Clutch
Wet Multiplate Clutch
Mulit Plate Wet Type
Wet Multiplate
-
Power Steering
-
Features
Steering
Handle bar type
Handle bar type
Handle bar type
-
A/C
-
Cruise Control
-
Navigation System
-
Telematics
-
Tiltable Steering
-
Arm-rest
-
Seat Type
Standard
Standard
Standard
-
Driver Information Display
-
Adjustable Driver Seat
-
Seating Capacity
D+3 Passenger
D+3 Passenger
D+3 Passenger
-
Tubeless Tyres
-
Seat Belts
-
Hill Hold
-
Brakes & Suspension
Brakes
Drum brake, Dual circuit, Hydraulic, Front & Rear combined with TMC
Drum Type, Dual circuit, Hydraulic combined with TMC
Drum Brakes
-
Front Axle
Rigid front axle
Drum type, Dual circuit, Hydraulic front & Rear combined with TMC
-
-
Front Suspension
Hydraulic Telescopic Double Acting, Helical Compression Spring and Damper
Fork Type with Double Helical Compression coil Spring with Telescopic Shock absorber
Coil Spring
-
Rear Suspension
Hydraulic Telescopic Double Acting, Heavy duty Spring Rubber Spring and Damper
Trailing Arm, Helical Compression coil Spring with Telescopic Shock absorber
Rubber Damper
-
ABS
-
Parking Brakes
-
Rear Axle
-
Drum type, Dual circuit, Hydraulic front & Rear combined with TMC
-
-
Body Option & Cabin Type
Chassis Type
Monocoque Pressed Section
Monocoque Chasis
Chassis with Cabin
-
Body Option
Fuliy Bulit
Fully Built
Fully Built
-
Cabin Type
Day Cabin
Day Cabin
Day Cabin
-
Tiltable Cabin
-
-
Tyres
Number of Tyre
3
3
3
-
Rear Tyre
4.5-10-8 PR
4.00 - 10, 6 PR
4.50 - 10, 8 PR
-
Front Tyre
4.5-10-8 PR
4.00 - 10, 6 PR
4.50 - 10, 8 PR
-
Others
Chassis
-
Loading Platform Area(Sq.ft)
27.08
1000
-
-
Battery(Volts)
12 V Multi Plate Lead Acid
12 V
12 V
-
Fog Lights
-
Other Details
Charging Time
No
No
No
No
Type Of Motor
No
No
No
No
Rating
4.5
4.5
4.7
4.7
Usecase
Transport
Transport
logistics
-

Which to buy

Which One Fits Your Use Case?

Atul Gem Paxx

Best for:

  • Transport

Atul RIK PLUS

Best for:

  • Transport

JSA NV CNG Passenger

Best for:

  • logistics

FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Atul Gem Paxx vs Atul RIK PLUS vs JSA NV CNG Passenger vs JSA NV CNG Passenger 1950/3 Seater/CNG?

+
Atul Gem Paxx has the lower price among these options.

Which has better power, Atul Gem Paxx vs Atul RIK PLUS vs JSA NV CNG Passenger vs JSA NV CNG Passenger 1950/3 Seater/CNG?

+
Atul Gem Paxx has the better power at 9.38 HP.

Which has better mileage, Atul Gem Paxx vs Atul RIK PLUS vs JSA NV CNG Passenger vs JSA NV CNG Passenger 1950/3 Seater/CNG?

+
Atul RIK PLUS has the better mileage at 45 km/l.

Which has better GVW, Atul Gem Paxx vs Atul RIK PLUS vs JSA NV CNG Passenger vs JSA NV CNG Passenger 1950/3 Seater/CNG?

+
Atul Gem Paxx has the better GVW at 849 kg.

Which truck should I choose between Atul Gem Paxx and Atul RIK PLUS?

+
Choose Atul Gem Paxx if its price, body type, fuel type, and payload fit your route and loading needs better. Choose Atul RIK PLUS if its specifications, service fit, or operating cost suits your business use case more closely.

What fuel types are available in Atul Gem Paxx vs Atul RIK PLUS vs JSA NV CNG Passenger vs JSA NV CNG Passenger 1950/3 Seater/CNG?

+
Atul Gem Paxx vs Atul RIK PLUS vs JSA NV CNG Passenger vs JSA NV CNG Passenger 1950/3 Seater/CNG include CNG fuel option. Buyers should compare fuel availability, route distance, and daily running cost before finalizing a truck.

What body types are compared in Atul Gem Paxx vs Atul RIK PLUS vs JSA NV CNG Passenger vs JSA NV CNG Passenger 1950/3 Seater/CNG?

+
This comparison includes Auto Rickshaw body type. Match the body type with your cargo, loading pattern, and city or highway route requirement.

How do tyre configurations compare in Atul Gem Paxx vs Atul RIK PLUS vs JSA NV CNG Passenger vs JSA NV CNG Passenger 1950/3 Seater/CNG?

+
Atul Gem Paxx has 3 tyres, Atul RIK PLUS has 3 tyres, JSA NV CNG Passenger has 3 tyres, JSA NV CNG Passenger 1950/3 Seater/CNG has 3 tyres. Tyre configuration matters for load stability, operating conditions, and maintenance planning.