Truck Comparison
Atul Gem Paxx vs Atul RIK PLUS vs JSA NV CNG Passenger vs Piaggio Ape Auto DXL: Price & Specs Comparison
Atul Gem Paxx is the more affordable option here by about ₹3,000. Atul Gem Paxx leads on power at 9.38 HP. The compared trucks cover Auto Rickshaw body type with CNG, Diesel fuel options.
This comparison uses the available truck data for Atul Gem Paxx vs Atul RIK PLUS vs JSA NV CNG Passenger vs Piaggio Ape Auto DXL so you can check which model fits better for your budget, route, payload requirement, fuel preference, and daily business usage.
Body type: Auto Rickshaw. Fuel options: CNG, Diesel. Tyres: 3. Payload: Atul Gem Paxx: NA | Atul RIK PLUS: NA | JSA NV CNG Passenger: NA | Piaggio Ape Auto DXL: NA.
Review all available price, mileage, power, torque, GVW, body type, tyres, gearbox, chassis, and extra specification details below before shortlisting a model.
Compare
Add Trucks to Compare
Details
Full Truck Details
Key Specifications16 specs
Price
₹2.66 L
₹2.71 L
₹2.65 L - ₹2.69 L
₹2.80 L
Brand
atul
atul
jsa
piaggio
Model
Atul Gem Paxx
Atul RIK PLUS
JSA NV CNG Passenger
Piaggio Ape Auto DXL
Body Type
Auto Rickshaw
Auto Rickshaw
Auto Rickshaw
Auto Rickshaw
Engine
395 cc
198.6 cc
G 400 W VI CNG
599 cc
Power
9.38 hp
6.75 kw
7 hp
7 Kw
Max Torque
23 Nm
13.35 Nm
23.5 Nm
23.5 Nm
Mileage
36 Kmpl
45 kmpl
30 km/kg
25 kmpl
Gross Vehicle Weight
849 kg
804 kg
800 kg
806 kg
Payload
NA
NA
NA
NA
No. of Tyres
3
3
3
3
Fuel Type
CNG
CNG
CNG
Diesel
Fuel Tank Capacity
CNG 40 / Petrol 2.8 Ltr
Water 40 / 2.9 Petrol Ltr
40 Ltr
10 Ltr
Max Speed
60 Km/h
60 Km/h
50 km/h
60 Km/h
Gear Box
4 Forward + 1 Reverse
4 Forward + 1 Reverse
Constant Mesh
5 Forward, 1 Reverse
Chassis Type
Monocoque Pressed Section
Monocoque Chasis
Chassis with Cabin
Chassis with Cabin
Performance17 specs
Max Power
9.38 hp
6.75 kW
7 hp
7 kW
Engine Displacement (cc)
395 cc
198.6 cc
-
599 cc
Fuel Tank (Litres)
CNG 40 / Petrol 2.8 Ltr
Water 40 / 2.9 Petrol Ltr
40 Ltr
10 Ltr
Engine
Four Stroke, Single Cylinder, Spark Ignition, Water Cooled
Single Cylinder 4 Stroke, Air Cooled
G 400 W VI CNG
Water cooled engine
Fuel Type
CNG
CNG
CNG
Diesel
Emission Norms
BS-VI
BS-VI
BS-VI
BS-VI
Max Torque
23 Nm
13.35 Nm
23.5 Nm
23.5 Nm
Mileage
36 kmpl
45 kmpl
-
25 kmpl
Gradeability (%)
10 %
26.7 %
-
23.8 %
Max Speed (km/h)
60
60
50
60
Engine Cylinders
1
1
-
1
Turning Radius (mm)
2500
2076
-
-
Battery Capacity
100 Ah
35 Ah
-
50 Ah
Product Type
L3M (Low Speed Passenger Carrier)
L3M (Low Speed Passenger Carrier)
L3M (Low Speed Passenger Carrier)
L3M (Low Speed Passenger Carrier)
Carrier Type
Passenger Carrier
Passenger Carrier
Passenger Carrier
Passenger Carrier
Type of Motor
-
BLDC Motor
-
-
Engine Displacement (cm3)
-
-
395
-
Dimension6 specs
Overall Length (mm)
2990
2810
2950
3140
Overall Width (mm)
1460
1390
1450
1465
Overall Height (mm)
1830
1858
1800
1950
Ground Clearance (mm)
255
220
155
240
Wheelbase (mm)
1925
1950
1950
2100
Axle Configuration
3x3
3x3
3x3
-
Transmission & Loading Capacity6 specs
Transmission
Constant mesh
Manual
Manual
Manual
GVW / GCW (Kgs)
849 kg
804 kg
800 kg
806 kg
Kerb Weight (Kgs)
529
484
500
506
Gear Box
4 Forward + 1 Reverse
4 Forward + 1 Reverse
Constant Mesh
5 Forward + 1 Reverse (Constant Mesh)
Clutch
Wet Multiplate Clutch
Mulit Plate Wet Type
Wet Multiplate
Multi Disc Wet Type
Power Steering
Features14 specs
Steering
Handle bar type
Handle bar type
Handle bar type
Handle bar type
A/C
Cruise Control
Navigation System
Telematics
Tiltable Steering
Arm-rest
Seat Type
Standard
Standard
Standard
Standard
Driver Information Display
Adjustable Driver Seat
Seating Capacity
D+3 Passenger
D+3 Passenger
D+3 Passenger
D+3 Passenger
Tubeless Tyres
Seat Belts
Hill Hold
Brakes & Suspension7 specs
Brakes
Drum brake, Dual circuit, Hydraulic, Front & Rear combined with TMC
Drum Type, Dual circuit, Hydraulic combined with TMC
Drum Brakes
Drum Brake Hydraulicaly Actuated Internal Expanding Shoe Type
Front Axle
Rigid front axle
Drum type, Dual circuit, Hydraulic front & Rear combined with TMC
-
Rigid front axle
Front Suspension
Hydraulic Telescopic Double Acting, Helical Compression Spring and Damper
Fork Type with Double Helical Compression coil Spring with Telescopic Shock absorber
Coil Spring
Hydraulic Telescopic Shock Absorber With Helical Compression Spring with dampener
Rear Suspension
Hydraulic Telescopic Double Acting, Heavy duty Spring Rubber Spring and Damper
Trailing Arm, Helical Compression coil Spring with Telescopic Shock absorber
Rubber Damper
Hydraulic Telescopic Shock Absorber With Rubber Compression Spring with dampener
ABS
Parking Brakes
Rear Axle
-
Drum type, Dual circuit, Hydraulic front & Rear combined with TMC
-
-
Body Option & Cabin Type4 specs
Chassis Type
Monocoque Pressed Section
Monocoque Chasis
Chassis with Cabin
Chassis with Cabin
Body Option
Fuliy Bulit
Fully Built
Fully Built
Fully Built
Cabin Type
Day Cabin
Day Cabin
Day Cabin
Day Cabin
Tiltable Cabin
-
Tyres3 specs
Number of Tyre
3
3
3
3
Rear Tyre
4.5-10-8 PR
4.00 - 10, 6 PR
4.50 - 10, 8 PR
4.50-10, 8 PR
Front Tyre
4.5-10-8 PR
4.00 - 10, 6 PR
4.50 - 10, 8 PR
4.50-10, 8 PR
Others4 specs
Chassis
Loading Platform Area(Sq.ft)
27.08
1000
-
-
Battery(Volts)
12 V Multi Plate Lead Acid
12 V
12 V
12 V
Fog Lights
Other Details4 specs
Charging Time
No
No
No
No
Type Of Motor
No
No
No
No
Rating
4.5
4.5
4.7
4.5
Usecase
Transport
Transport
logistics
Transport
Which to buy
Which One Fits Your Use Case?
FAQs
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, Atul Gem Paxx vs Atul RIK PLUS vs JSA NV CNG Passenger vs Piaggio Ape Auto DXL?
+−
Atul Gem Paxx has the lower price among these options.
Which has better power, Atul Gem Paxx vs Atul RIK PLUS vs JSA NV CNG Passenger vs Piaggio Ape Auto DXL?
+−
Atul Gem Paxx has the better power at 9.38 HP.
Which has better mileage, Atul Gem Paxx vs Atul RIK PLUS vs JSA NV CNG Passenger vs Piaggio Ape Auto DXL?
+−
Atul RIK PLUS has the better mileage at 45 km/l.
Which has better GVW, Atul Gem Paxx vs Atul RIK PLUS vs JSA NV CNG Passenger vs Piaggio Ape Auto DXL?
+−
Atul Gem Paxx has the better GVW at 849 kg.
Which truck should I choose between Atul Gem Paxx and Atul RIK PLUS?
+−
Choose Atul Gem Paxx if its price, body type, fuel type, and payload fit your route and loading needs better. Choose Atul RIK PLUS if its specifications, service fit, or operating cost suits your business use case more closely.
What fuel types are available in Atul Gem Paxx vs Atul RIK PLUS vs JSA NV CNG Passenger vs Piaggio Ape Auto DXL?
+−
Atul Gem Paxx vs Atul RIK PLUS vs JSA NV CNG Passenger vs Piaggio Ape Auto DXL include CNG, Diesel fuel options. Buyers should compare fuel availability, route distance, and daily running cost before finalizing a truck.
What body types are compared in Atul Gem Paxx vs Atul RIK PLUS vs JSA NV CNG Passenger vs Piaggio Ape Auto DXL?
+−
This comparison includes Auto Rickshaw body type. Match the body type with your cargo, loading pattern, and city or highway route requirement.
How do tyre configurations compare in Atul Gem Paxx vs Atul RIK PLUS vs JSA NV CNG Passenger vs Piaggio Ape Auto DXL?
+−
Atul Gem Paxx has 3 tyres, Atul RIK PLUS has 3 tyres, JSA NV CNG Passenger has 3 tyres, Piaggio Ape Auto DXL has 3 tyres. Tyre configuration matters for load stability, operating conditions, and maintenance planning.