Truck Comparison
Atul Gemini Passenger vs Atul Rik vs Atul RIK CUB vs Eko Tejas Metro-101: Price & Specs Comparison
Eko Tejas Metro-101 is the more affordable option here by about ₹25,000. Eko Tejas Metro-101 leads on mileage at 80 km/l. The compared trucks cover Auto Rickshaw body type with CNG, LPG, Electric fuel options.
This comparison uses the available truck data for Atul Gemini Passenger vs Atul Rik vs Atul RIK CUB vs Eko Tejas Metro-101 so you can check which model fits better for your budget, route, payload requirement, fuel preference, and daily business usage.
Body type: Auto Rickshaw. Fuel options: CNG, LPG, Electric. Tyres: 3. Payload: Atul Gemini Passenger: 500 Kgs | Atul Rik: NA | Atul RIK CUB: No | Eko Tejas Metro-101: NA.
Review all available price, mileage, power, torque, GVW, body type, tyres, gearbox, chassis, and extra specification details below before shortlisting a model.
Compare
Add Trucks to Compare
Details
Full Truck Details
Key Specifications16 specs
Price
₹2.15 L
₹1.94 L - ₹2.00 L
₹1.95 L - ₹2.00 L
₹1.75 L
Brand
atul
atul
atul
eko-tejas
Model
Atul Gemini Passenger
Atul Rik
Atul RIK CUB
Eko Tejas Metro-101
Body Type
Auto Rickshaw
Auto Rickshaw
Auto Rickshaw
Auto Rickshaw
Engine
198.6 cc
200 cc
198.6 cc
NA
Power
7 hp
9.59 hp
9.86 hp
1 hp
Max Torque
11.70 Nm
14.22 Nm
14.7 Nm
NA
Mileage
25 kmpl
25 kmpl
25 kmpl
80-120
Gross Vehicle Weight
688 kg
727 kg
748 kg
590 kg
Payload
500 Kgs
NA
No
NA
No. of Tyres
3
3
3
3
Fuel Type
CNG
LPG
CNG
Electric
Fuel Tank Capacity
30 Ltr
LPG 30/ Petrol 2.8 Ltr
CNG 30 / Petrol 2.8 Ltr
4.32 Kwh
Max Speed
45 Km/h
50 Km/h
40 Km/h
25 Km/h
Gear Box
4 Forward + 1 Reverse
4 Forward + 1 Reverse
4 Forward + 1 Reverse
1 Forward + 1 Reverse
Chassis Type
Chassis with Cabin
Chassis with Cabin
Chassis with Cabin
Chassis with Cabin
Performance15 specs
Max Power
7 hp
9.59 hp
9.86 hp
-
Engine Displacement (cc)
198.6 cc
200 cc
198.6 cc
-
Fuel Tank (Litres)
30 Ltr
LPG 30/ Petrol 2.8 Ltr
CNG 30 / Petrol 2.8 Ltr
-
Engine
Four Stroke, Air Cooled
4 Stroke, Single Cylinder, Air Cooled
Single cylinder four stroke SI engine
-
Fuel Type
CNG
LPG
CNG
-
Emission Norms
BS-VI
BS-VI
BS-VI
-
Max Torque
11.70 Nm
14.22 Nm
14.7 Nm
-
Mileage
25 kmpl
25 kmpl
25 kmpl
-
Gradeability (%)
15 %
-
-
-
Max Speed (km/h)
45
50
40
-
Engine Cylinders
1
1
1
-
Turning Radius (mm)
2500
2076
9000
-
Battery Capacity
35 Ah
100 Ah
35 Ah
-
Product Type
L3M (Low Speed Passenger Carrier)
L3M (Low Speed Passenger Carrier)
L3M (Low Speed Passenger Carrier)
-
Carrier Type
Passenger Carrier
Passenger Carrier
Passenger Carrier
-
Dimension6 specs
Overall Length (mm)
2720
2765
2720
-
Overall Width (mm)
1340
1420
1420
-
Overall Height (mm)
1750
1800
1800
-
Ground Clearance (mm)
180
185
185
-
Wheelbase (mm)
1918
1950
1950
-
Axle Configuration
3x3
3x3
3x3
-
Transmission & Loading Capacity7 specs
Transmission
Manual
Constant mesh
Manual
-
Payload (Kgs)
500 Kgs
-
-
-
GVW / GCW (Kgs)
688 kg
727 kg
748 kg
-
Kerb Weight (Kgs)
389
407
428
-
Gear Box
4 Forward + 1 Reverse
4 Forward + 1 Reverse
4 Forward + 1 Reverse
-
Clutch
Constant Mesh with Wet Multiplate Clutch
Multi-Plate Wet Type
Multi-Plate weight type
-
Power Steering
-
Features14 specs
Steering
Handle bar type
Handle bar type
Handle bar type
-
A/C
-
Cruise Control
-
Navigation System
-
Telematics
-
Tiltable Steering
-
Arm-rest
-
Seat Type
Standard
Standard
Standard
-
Driver Information Display
-
Adjustable Driver Seat
-
Seating Capacity
D+3 Passenger
D+3 Passenger
D+3 Passenger
-
Tubeless Tyres
-
Seat Belts
-
Hill Hold
-
Brakes & Suspension5 specs
Brakes
Drum Brake
Dual Type, Dual Circuit, Hydraulic, Front & Rear combined with TMC
Drum Type, Dual Circuit, Hydraulic Front & Rear With TMC
-
Front Suspension
Swing Arm & Spring with Leading Link Suspension
Helical Compression Spring and Damper
Helical compression spring and shock absorber
-
Rear Suspension
Swing Arm Triangle with Rubber Spring & Double Acting Shock Absorbers
Helical Compression Spring and Damper
Helical compression spring and shock absorber
-
ABS
-
Parking Brakes
-
Body Option & Cabin Type4 specs
Chassis Type
Cabin With Chassis
Chassis with Cabin
Chassis with Cabin
-
Body Option
Fully Built
Fuliy Bulit
Fully Built
-
Cabin Type
Day Cabin
Day Cabin
Day Cabin
-
Tiltable Cabin
-
Tyres3 specs
Number of Tyre
3
3
3
-
Rear Tyre
4 - 8- 6 PR
4.00 -8-4 PR
4.00-8-4 PR
-
Front Tyre
4 - 8- 6 PR
4.00 -8-4 PR
4.00-8-4 PR
-
Others3 specs
Chassis
-
Battery(Volts)
12V
12 V
12V
-
Fog Lights
-
Other Details4 specs
Charging Time
No
No
No
4-5 Hours
Type Of Motor
No
No
No
Dc Brushless Motor
Rating
4.5
4.5
4.5
-
Usecase
Transport
Transport
Transport
Transport
Which to buy
Which One Fits Your Use Case?
FAQs
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, Atul Gemini Passenger vs Atul Rik vs Atul RIK CUB vs Eko Tejas Metro-101?
+−
Eko Tejas Metro-101 has the lower price among these options.
Which has better power, Atul Gemini Passenger vs Atul Rik vs Atul RIK CUB vs Eko Tejas Metro-101?
+−
Atul RIK CUB has the better power at 9.86 HP.
Which has better torque, Atul Gemini Passenger vs Atul Rik vs Atul RIK CUB vs Eko Tejas Metro-101?
+−
Atul RIK CUB has the better torque at 14.7.
Which has better mileage, Atul Gemini Passenger vs Atul Rik vs Atul RIK CUB vs Eko Tejas Metro-101?
+−
Eko Tejas Metro-101 has the better mileage at 80 km/l.
Which has better GVW, Atul Gemini Passenger vs Atul Rik vs Atul RIK CUB vs Eko Tejas Metro-101?
+−
Atul RIK CUB has the better GVW at 748 kg.
Which truck should I choose between Atul Gemini Passenger and Atul Rik?
+−
Choose Atul Gemini Passenger if its price, body type, fuel type, and payload fit your route and loading needs better. Choose Atul Rik if its specifications, service fit, or operating cost suits your business use case more closely.
What fuel types are available in Atul Gemini Passenger vs Atul Rik vs Atul RIK CUB vs Eko Tejas Metro-101?
+−
Atul Gemini Passenger vs Atul Rik vs Atul RIK CUB vs Eko Tejas Metro-101 include CNG, LPG, Electric fuel options. Buyers should compare fuel availability, route distance, and daily running cost before finalizing a truck.
What body types are compared in Atul Gemini Passenger vs Atul Rik vs Atul RIK CUB vs Eko Tejas Metro-101?
+−
This comparison includes Auto Rickshaw body type. Match the body type with your cargo, loading pattern, and city or highway route requirement.
How do tyre configurations compare in Atul Gemini Passenger vs Atul Rik vs Atul RIK CUB vs Eko Tejas Metro-101?
+−
Atul Gemini Passenger has 3 tyres, Atul Rik has 3 tyres, Atul RIK CUB has 3 tyres, Eko Tejas Metro-101 has 3 tyres. Tyre configuration matters for load stability, operating conditions, and maintenance planning.