TruckOnWheelsTruckOnWheels

Truck Comparison

Atul RIK PLUS vs Baxy Mobility Express M-TEC vs JSA NV CNG Passenger vs Piaggio Ape Auto DXL: Price & Specs Comparison

JSA NV CNG Passenger is the more affordable option here by about ₹2,000. Atul RIK PLUS leads on mileage at 45 km/l. The compared trucks cover Auto Rickshaw body type with CNG, Diesel fuel options.

This comparison uses the available truck data for Atul RIK PLUS vs Baxy Mobility Express M-TEC vs JSA NV CNG Passenger vs Piaggio Ape Auto DXL so you can check which model fits better for your budget, route, payload requirement, fuel preference, and daily business usage.

Body type: Auto Rickshaw. Fuel options: CNG, Diesel. Tyres: 3. Payload: Atul RIK PLUS: NA | Baxy Mobility Express M-TEC: No | JSA NV CNG Passenger: NA | Piaggio Ape Auto DXL: NA.

Review all available price, mileage, power, torque, GVW, body type, tyres, gearbox, chassis, and extra specification details below before shortlisting a model.

Compare

Add Trucks to Compare

Details

Full Truck Details

Specs
This TruckAtul RIK PLUS

₹2.71 L

Baxy Mobility Express M-TEC

₹2.88 L - ₹2.90 L

JSA NV CNG Passenger

₹2.65 L - ₹2.69 L

Piaggio Ape Auto DXL

₹2.80 L

Key Specifications
Price
₹2.71 L
₹2.88 L - ₹2.90 L
₹2.65 L - ₹2.69 L
₹2.80 L
Brand
atul
baxy
jsa
piaggio
Model
Atul RIK PLUS
Baxy Mobility Express M-TEC
JSA NV CNG Passenger
Piaggio Ape Auto DXL
Body Type
Auto Rickshaw
Auto Rickshaw
Auto Rickshaw
Auto Rickshaw
Engine
198.6 cc
430 cc
G 400 W VI CNG
599 cc
Power
6.75 kw
8 hp
7 hp
7 Kw
Max Torque
13.35 Nm
23 Nm
23.5 Nm
23.5 Nm
Mileage
45 kmpl
No
30 km/kg
25 kmpl
Gross Vehicle Weight
804 kg
990 kg
800 kg
806 kg
Payload
NA
No
NA
NA
No. of Tyres
3
3
3
3
Fuel Type
CNG
Diesel
CNG
Diesel
Fuel Tank Capacity
Water 40 / 2.9 Petrol Ltr
10 Ltr
40 Ltr
10 Ltr
Max Speed
60 Km/h
50 km/h
50 km/h
60 Km/h
Gear Box
4 Forward + 1 Reverse
4 Forward + 1 Reverse
Constant Mesh
5 Forward, 1 Reverse
Chassis Type
Monocoque Chasis
Chassis with Cabin
Chassis with Cabin
Chassis with Cabin
Performance
Max Power
6.75 kW
8 hp
7 hp
7 kW
Engine Displacement (cc)
198.6 cc
430 cc
-
599 cc
Fuel Tank (Litres)
Water 40 / 2.9 Petrol Ltr
10 Ltr
40 Ltr
10 Ltr
Engine
Single Cylinder 4 Stroke, Air Cooled
-
G 400 W VI CNG
Water cooled engine
Fuel Type
CNG
Diesel
CNG
Diesel
Emission Norms
BS-VI
BS-VI
BS-VI
BS-VI
Max Torque
13.35 Nm
23 Nm
23.5 Nm
23.5 Nm
Mileage
45 kmpl
-
-
25 kmpl
Gradeability (%)
26.7 %
18 %
-
23.8 %
Max Speed (km/h)
60
50
50
60
Engine Cylinders
1
-
-
1
Turning Radius (mm)
2076
2800
-
-
Battery Capacity
35 Ah
80 Ah
-
50 Ah
Type of Motor
BLDC Motor
-
-
-
Carrier Type
Passenger Carrier
Passenger Carrier
Passenger Carrier
Passenger Carrier
Product Type
L3M (Low Speed Passenger Carrier)
L3M (Low Speed Passenger Carrier)
L3M (Low Speed Passenger Carrier)
L3M (Low Speed Passenger Carrier)
Engine Displacement (cm3)
-
-
395
-
Dimension
Overall Length (mm)
2810
2770
2950
3140
Overall Width (mm)
1390
1500
1450
1465
Overall Height (mm)
1858
1780
1800
1950
Ground Clearance (mm)
220
170
155
240
Wheelbase (mm)
1950
-
1950
2100
Axle Configuration
3x3
3x3
3x3
-
Transmission & Loading Capacity
Transmission
Manual
Manual
Manual
Manual
GVW / GCW (Kgs)
804 kg
990 kg
800 kg
806 kg
Kerb Weight (Kgs)
484
990
500
506
Gear Box
4 Forward + 1 Reverse
4 Forward + 1 Reverse
Constant Mesh
5 Forward + 1 Reverse (Constant Mesh)
Clutch
Mulit Plate Wet Type
Wet, Multiplate Clutch
Wet Multiplate
Multi Disc Wet Type
Power Steering
Features
Steering
Handle bar type
Handle bar type
Handle bar type
Handle bar type
A/C
Cruise Control
Navigation System
Telematics
Tiltable Steering
Arm-rest
Seat Type
Standard
Standard
Standard
Standard
Driver Information Display
Adjustable Driver Seat
Seating Capacity
D+3 Passenger
D+3 Passenger
D+3 Passenger
D+3 Passenger
Tubeless Tyres
Seat Belts
Hill Hold
Brakes & Suspension
Brakes
Drum Type, Dual circuit, Hydraulic combined with TMC
Drum Brake
Drum Brakes
Drum Brake Hydraulicaly Actuated Internal Expanding Shoe Type
Front Axle
Drum type, Dual circuit, Hydraulic front & Rear combined with TMC
-
-
Rigid front axle
Front Suspension
Fork Type with Double Helical Compression coil Spring with Telescopic Shock absorber
MacPherson strut suspension
Coil Spring
Hydraulic Telescopic Shock Absorber With Helical Compression Spring with dampener
Rear Axle
Drum type, Dual circuit, Hydraulic front & Rear combined with TMC
-
-
-
Rear Suspension
Trailing Arm, Helical Compression coil Spring with Telescopic Shock absorber
Leaf Spring Suspension
Rubber Damper
Hydraulic Telescopic Shock Absorber With Rubber Compression Spring with dampener
ABS
Parking Brakes
Body Option & Cabin Type
Chassis Type
Monocoque Chasis
Chassis with Cabin
Chassis with Cabin
Chassis with Cabin
Body Option
Fully Built
Fully Built
Fully Built
Fully Built
Cabin Type
Day Cabin
Day Cabin
Day Cabin
Day Cabin
Tiltable Cabin
-
Tyres
Number of Tyre
3
3
3
3
Rear Tyre
4.00 - 10, 6 PR
4.00 x 8
4.50 - 10, 8 PR
4.50-10, 8 PR
Front Tyre
4.00 - 10, 6 PR
4.00 x 8
4.50 - 10, 8 PR
4.50-10, 8 PR
Others
Chassis
Loading Platform Area(Sq.ft)
1000
16
-
-
Battery(Volts)
12 V
48 V
12 V
12 V
Fog Lights
Charging
Charging Time
-
3-4 Hrs
-
-
Other Details
Charging Time
No
No
No
No
Type Of Motor
No
No
No
No
Rating
4.5
4.5
4.7
4.5
Usecase
Transport
Shared rides, Short-distance commute, Feeder service, Goods transport
logistics
Transport

Which to buy

Which One Fits Your Use Case?

Atul RIK PLUS

Best for:

  • Transport

Baxy Mobility Express M-TEC

Best for:

  • Shared rides
  • Short-distance commute
  • Feeder service
  • Goods transport

JSA NV CNG Passenger

Best for:

  • logistics

Piaggio Ape Auto DXL

Best for:

  • Transport

FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Atul RIK PLUS vs Baxy Mobility Express M-TEC vs JSA NV CNG Passenger vs Piaggio Ape Auto DXL?

+
JSA NV CNG Passenger has the lower price among these options.

Which has better power, Atul RIK PLUS vs Baxy Mobility Express M-TEC vs JSA NV CNG Passenger vs Piaggio Ape Auto DXL?

+
Baxy Mobility Express M-TEC has the better power at 8 HP.

Which has better mileage, Atul RIK PLUS vs Baxy Mobility Express M-TEC vs JSA NV CNG Passenger vs Piaggio Ape Auto DXL?

+
Atul RIK PLUS has the better mileage at 45 km/l.

Which has better GVW, Atul RIK PLUS vs Baxy Mobility Express M-TEC vs JSA NV CNG Passenger vs Piaggio Ape Auto DXL?

+
Baxy Mobility Express M-TEC has the better GVW at 990 kg.

Which truck should I choose between Atul RIK PLUS and Baxy Mobility Express M-TEC?

+
Choose Atul RIK PLUS if its price, body type, fuel type, and payload fit your route and loading needs better. Choose Baxy Mobility Express M-TEC if its specifications, service fit, or operating cost suits your business use case more closely.

What fuel types are available in Atul RIK PLUS vs Baxy Mobility Express M-TEC vs JSA NV CNG Passenger vs Piaggio Ape Auto DXL?

+
Atul RIK PLUS vs Baxy Mobility Express M-TEC vs JSA NV CNG Passenger vs Piaggio Ape Auto DXL include CNG, Diesel fuel options. Buyers should compare fuel availability, route distance, and daily running cost before finalizing a truck.

What body types are compared in Atul RIK PLUS vs Baxy Mobility Express M-TEC vs JSA NV CNG Passenger vs Piaggio Ape Auto DXL?

+
This comparison includes Auto Rickshaw body type. Match the body type with your cargo, loading pattern, and city or highway route requirement.

How do tyre configurations compare in Atul RIK PLUS vs Baxy Mobility Express M-TEC vs JSA NV CNG Passenger vs Piaggio Ape Auto DXL?

+
Atul RIK PLUS has 3 tyres, Baxy Mobility Express M-TEC has 3 tyres, JSA NV CNG Passenger has 3 tyres, Piaggio Ape Auto DXL has 3 tyres. Tyre configuration matters for load stability, operating conditions, and maintenance planning.