Truck Comparison
Atul RIK PLUS vs Baxy Mobility Express M-TEC vs Mahindra Alfa Dx vs Piaggio Ape Auto DXL 3-Seater/2100: Price & Specs Comparison
Atul RIK PLUS is the more affordable option here by about ₹9,000. Atul RIK PLUS leads on mileage at 45 km/l. The compared trucks cover Auto Rickshaw body type with CNG, Diesel fuel options.
This comparison uses the available truck data for Atul RIK PLUS vs Baxy Mobility Express M-TEC vs Mahindra Alfa Dx vs Piaggio Ape Auto DXL 3-Seater/2100 so you can check which model fits better for your budget, route, payload requirement, fuel preference, and daily business usage.
Body type: Auto Rickshaw. Fuel options: CNG, Diesel. Tyres: 3. Payload: Atul RIK PLUS: NA | Baxy Mobility Express M-TEC: No | Mahindra Alfa Dx: 320 kgs | Piaggio Ape Auto DXL 3-Seater/2100: NA.
Review all available price, mileage, power, torque, GVW, body type, tyres, gearbox, chassis, and extra specification details below before shortlisting a model.
Compare
Add Trucks to Compare
Details
Full Truck Details
Key Specifications16 specs
Price
₹2.71 L
₹2.88 L - ₹2.90 L
₹2.88 L - ₹2.89 L
₹2.80 L
Brand
atul
baxy
mahindra
piaggio
Model
Atul RIK PLUS
Baxy Mobility Express M-TEC
Mahindra Alfa Dx
Piaggio Ape Auto DXL 3-Seater/2100
Body Type
Auto Rickshaw
Auto Rickshaw
Auto Rickshaw
Auto Rickshaw
Engine
198.6 cc
430 cc
597 cc
599 cc
Power
6.75 kw
8 hp
7 kW
7 Kw
Max Torque
13.35 Nm
23 Nm
23.5 Nm
23.5 Nm
Mileage
45 kmpl
No
28.9 kmpl
25 kmpl
Gross Vehicle Weight
804 kg
990 kg
835 kg
806 kg
Payload
NA
No
320 kgs
NA
No. of Tyres
3
3
3
3
Fuel Type
CNG
Diesel
Diesel
Diesel
Fuel Tank Capacity
Water 40 / 2.9 Petrol Ltr
10 Ltr
10.5 Ltr
10 Ltr
Max Speed
60 Km/h
50 km/h
54 Km/h
60 Km/h
Gear Box
4 Forward + 1 Reverse
4 Forward + 1 Reverse
5 Forward + 1 Reverse
5 Forward + 1 Reverse (Constant Mesh)
Chassis Type
Monocoque Chasis
Chassis with Cabin
Chassis with Cabin
Chassis with Cabin
Performance18 specs
Max Power
6.75 kW
8 hp
7 kW
7 kW
Engine Displacement (cc)
198.6 cc
430 cc
-
599 cc
Fuel Tank (Litres)
Water 40 / 2.9 Petrol Ltr
10 Ltr
10.5 Ltr
10 Ltr
Engine
Single Cylinder 4 Stroke, Air Cooled
-
Greaves Cotton, Single Cylender, Water Cooled Engine
Water cooled engine
Fuel Type
CNG
Diesel
Diesel
Diesel
Emission Norms
BS-VI
BS-VI
BS-VI
BS-VI
Max Torque
13.35 Nm
23 Nm
23.5 Nm
23.5 Nm
Mileage
45 kmpl
-
28.9 kmpl
25 kmpl
Gradeability (%)
26.7 %
18 %
10 %
23.8 %
Max Speed (km/h)
60
50
-
60
Engine Cylinders
1
-
1
1
Turning Radius (mm)
2076
2800
-
-
Battery Capacity
35 Ah
80 Ah
-
50 Ah
Type of Motor
BLDC Motor
-
-
-
Carrier Type
Passenger Carrier
Passenger Carrier
Passenger Carrier
Passenger Carrier
Product Type
L3M (Low Speed Passenger Carrier)
L3M (Low Speed Passenger Carrier)
L3M (Low Speed Passenger Carrier)
L3M (Low Speed Passenger Carrier)
Top Speed
-
-
54
-
Engine Displacement (cm3)
-
-
597
-
Dimension6 specs
Overall Length (mm)
2810
2770
3025
3140
Overall Width (mm)
1390
1500
1480
1465
Overall Height (mm)
1858
1780
1930
1950
Ground Clearance (mm)
220
170
175
240
Wheelbase (mm)
1950
-
2005
2100
Axle Configuration
3x3
3x3
-
-
Transmission & Loading Capacity7 specs
Transmission
Manual
Manual
Manual
Manual
GVW / GCW (Kgs)
804 kg
990 kg
835 kg
806 kg
Kerb Weight (Kgs)
484
990
-
506
Gear Box
4 Forward + 1 Reverse
4 Forward + 1 Reverse
5 Forward + 1 Reverse
5 Forward + 1 Reverse (Constant Mesh)
Clutch
Mulit Plate Wet Type
Wet, Multiplate Clutch
Multi plate weight clutch
Multi Disc Wet Type
Power Steering
Payload (Kgs)
-
-
320 Kgs
-
Features14 specs
Steering
Handle bar type
Handle bar type
Handle bar type
Handle bar type
A/C
Cruise Control
Navigation System
Telematics
Tiltable Steering
Arm-rest
Seat Type
Standard
Standard
Standard
Standard
Driver Information Display
Adjustable Driver Seat
Seating Capacity
D+3 Passenger
D+3 Passenger
D+3 Passenger
D+3 Passenger
Tubeless Tyres
Seat Belts
Hill Hold
Brakes & Suspension7 specs
Brakes
Drum Type, Dual circuit, Hydraulic combined with TMC
Drum Brake
Drum Brakes
Drum Brake Hydraulicaly Actuated Internal Expanding Shoe Type
Front Axle
Drum type, Dual circuit, Hydraulic front & Rear combined with TMC
-
Rigid front axle
Rigid front axle
Front Suspension
Fork Type with Double Helical Compression coil Spring with Telescopic Shock absorber
MacPherson strut suspension
Coil Spring and telescopic hydraulic
Hydraulic Telescopic Shock Absorber With Helical Compression Spring with dampener
Rear Axle
Drum type, Dual circuit, Hydraulic front & Rear combined with TMC
-
-
-
Rear Suspension
Trailing Arm, Helical Compression coil Spring with Telescopic Shock absorber
Leaf Spring Suspension
Rubber spring, telescopic hyraulic shock absorber
Hydraulic Telescopic Shock Absorber With Rubber Compression Spring with dampener
ABS
Parking Brakes
Body Option & Cabin Type4 specs
Chassis Type
Monocoque Chasis
Chassis with Cabin
Chassis with Cabin
Chassis with Cabin
Body Option
Fully Built
Fully Built
Fuliy Bulit
Fully Built
Cabin Type
Day Cabin
Day Cabin
Day Cabin
Day Cabin
Tiltable Cabin
Tyres3 specs
Number of Tyre
3
3
3
3
Rear Tyre
4.00 - 10, 6 PR
4.00 x 8
4.50 X 10 - 8 PR
4.50-10, 8 PR
Front Tyre
4.00 - 10, 6 PR
4.00 x 8
4.50 X 10 - 8 PR
4.50-10, 8 PR
Others4 specs
Chassis
Loading Platform Area(Sq.ft)
1000
16
-
-
Battery(Volts)
12 V
48 V
-
12 V
Fog Lights
Charging2 specs
Charging Time
-
3-4 Hrs
-
-
AC & DC (if available)
-
-
-
Other Details4 specs
Charging Time
No
No
No
No
Type Of Motor
No
No
No
No
Rating
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
Usecase
Transport
Shared rides, Short-distance commute, Feeder service, Goods transport
Transport
Transport
Which to buy
Which One Fits Your Use Case?
FAQs
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, Atul RIK PLUS vs Baxy Mobility Express M-TEC vs Mahindra Alfa Dx vs Piaggio Ape Auto DXL 3-Seater/2100?
+−
Atul RIK PLUS has the lower price among these options.
Which has better power, Atul RIK PLUS vs Baxy Mobility Express M-TEC vs Mahindra Alfa Dx vs Piaggio Ape Auto DXL 3-Seater/2100?
+−
Baxy Mobility Express M-TEC has the better power at 8 HP.
Which has better mileage, Atul RIK PLUS vs Baxy Mobility Express M-TEC vs Mahindra Alfa Dx vs Piaggio Ape Auto DXL 3-Seater/2100?
+−
Atul RIK PLUS has the better mileage at 45 km/l.
Which has better GVW, Atul RIK PLUS vs Baxy Mobility Express M-TEC vs Mahindra Alfa Dx vs Piaggio Ape Auto DXL 3-Seater/2100?
+−
Baxy Mobility Express M-TEC has the better GVW at 990 kg.
Which truck should I choose between Atul RIK PLUS and Baxy Mobility Express M-TEC?
+−
Choose Atul RIK PLUS if its price, body type, fuel type, and payload fit your route and loading needs better. Choose Baxy Mobility Express M-TEC if its specifications, service fit, or operating cost suits your business use case more closely.
What fuel types are available in Atul RIK PLUS vs Baxy Mobility Express M-TEC vs Mahindra Alfa Dx vs Piaggio Ape Auto DXL 3-Seater/2100?
+−
Atul RIK PLUS vs Baxy Mobility Express M-TEC vs Mahindra Alfa Dx vs Piaggio Ape Auto DXL 3-Seater/2100 include CNG, Diesel fuel options. Buyers should compare fuel availability, route distance, and daily running cost before finalizing a truck.
What body types are compared in Atul RIK PLUS vs Baxy Mobility Express M-TEC vs Mahindra Alfa Dx vs Piaggio Ape Auto DXL 3-Seater/2100?
+−
This comparison includes Auto Rickshaw body type. Match the body type with your cargo, loading pattern, and city or highway route requirement.
How do tyre configurations compare in Atul RIK PLUS vs Baxy Mobility Express M-TEC vs Mahindra Alfa Dx vs Piaggio Ape Auto DXL 3-Seater/2100?
+−
Atul RIK PLUS has 3 tyres, Baxy Mobility Express M-TEC has 3 tyres, Mahindra Alfa Dx has 3 tyres, Piaggio Ape Auto DXL 3-Seater/2100 has 3 tyres. Tyre configuration matters for load stability, operating conditions, and maintenance planning.