Truck Comparison

Avon E-CARGO vs JSA E Cart vs E-Ranger Loader vs Etron Midbin 1960/Electric: Price & Specs Comparison

JSA E Cart is the more affordable option here by about ₹1,000. Etron Midbin 1960/Electric leads on payload at 800 kg. The compared trucks cover 3 Wheeler body type with Electric fuel option.

This comparison uses the available truck data for Avon E-CARGO vs JSA E Cart vs E-Ranger Loader vs Etron Midbin 1960/Electric so you can check which model fits better for your budget, route, payload requirement, fuel preference, and daily business usage.

Body type: 3 Wheeler. Fuel option: Electric. Tyres: 3. Payload: Avon E-CARGO: NA | JSA E Cart: 322 Kgs | E-Ranger Loader: 310 Kgs | Etron Midbin 1960/Electric: 800 kgs .

Review all available price, mileage, power, torque, GVW, body type, tyres, gearbox, chassis, and extra specification details below before shortlisting a model.

Compare

Add Trucks to Compare

Details

Full Truck Details

Specs
This TruckAvon E-CARGO

₹1.41 L

JSA E Cart

₹1.40 L

Etron Midbin 1960/Electric

₹1.37 L - ₹1.42 L

Key Specifications
Price
₹1.41 L
₹1.40 L
₹1.42 L
₹1.37 L - ₹1.42 L
Brand
avon
jsa
e-ranger
etron
Model
Avon E-CARGO
JSA E Cart
E-Ranger Loader
Etron Midbin 1960/Electric
Body Type
3 Wheeler
3 Wheeler
3 Wheeler
3 Wheeler
Engine
NA
NA
NA
No
Power
1 hp
1 hp
1 hp
1 hp
Max Torque
NA
NA
NA
No
Mileage
100-150 km
80-100 km/Per Charge
100 KM
100-140 KM/Full Charge
Gross Vehicle Weight
550 kg
322 kg
729 kg
370 kg
Payload
NA
322 Kgs
310 Kgs
800 kgs
No. of Tyres
3
3
3
3
Fuel Type
Electric
Electric
Electric
Electric
Fuel Tank Capacity
110 Ah
100 Ah
130 kWh
120 Ah
Max Speed
24 Km/h
25 km/h
20.8 km/h
25 km/h
Gear Box
1 Forward + 1 Reverse
Constant Mesh
1 Forward + 1 Reverse
1 Forward + 1 Reverse
Chassis Type
Heavy Duty Chassis
Chassis with Cabin
Chassis with Cabin
Chassis with Cabin
Performance
Max Power
1 hp
1 hp
1 hp
-
Fuel Type
Electric
Electric
Electric
-
Emission Norms
Zero Tailpipe
Zero Tailpipe
Zero Tailpipe
-
Max Torque
22 Nm
-
-
-
Gradeability (%)
5 %
-
7 %
-
Max Speed (km/h)
24
25
20.8
-
Range
150
80-100
100
-
Battery Capacity
110 Ah
150 Ah
130 kWh
-
Type of Motor
BLDC Motor
DC Brush Less
BLDC Motor
-
Product Type
L3N (Low Speed Goods Carrier)
L3N (Low Speed Goods Carrier)
L3N (Low Speed Goods Carrier)
-
Carrier Type
Goods Carrier
Goods Carrier
Goods Carrier
-
Turning Radius (mm)
-
2500
6000
-
Motor Capacity
-
1000 W
-
-
Charging
Charging Time
7-8 Hours
8 Hours
7-8 Hours
-
Dimension
Overall Length (mm)
2400
2785
2797
-
Overall Width (mm)
1150
998
980
-
Overall Height (mm)
1720
1270
1330
-
Ground Clearance (mm)
180
170
325
-
Axle Configuration
3x3
3x3
3x3
-
Wheelbase (mm)
-
2120
1800
-
Loading Length {mm}
-
-
1400
-
Loading Width {mm}
-
-
970
-
Loading Height {mm}
-
-
510
-
Transmission & Loading Capacity
Transmission
Automatic
Differential Type
Automatic
-
Payload (Kgs)
380 Kgs
-
310 Kgs
-
GVW / GCW (Kgs)
550 kg
-
729 kg
-
Gear Box
1 Forward + 1 Reverse
1 Forward + 1 Reverse
1 Forward + 1 Reverse
-
Power Steering
-
Kerb Weight (Kgs)
-
-
310
-
Features
Steering
Handle bar type
Handle bar type
Handle bar type
-
A/C
-
Cruise Control
-
Navigation System
-
Telematics
-
Tiltable Steering
-
Arm-rest
-
Seat Type
Standard
Standard
Standard
-
Driver Information Display
-
Adjustable Driver Seat
-
Seating Capacity
Driver Only
Driver Only
Driver Only
-
Tubeless Tyres
-
Seat Belts
-
Hill Hold
-
Brakes & Suspension
Brakes
Drum Brake
Drum Brakes
Drum Type
-
Front Suspension
Telescopic Suspension
Telescopic Shock Absorber
Hydraulic Shocker
-
Rear Suspension
Double Movement Leaf Spring with Hydraulic Shockers
Leaf Spring 2 Nos
Leaf Spring
-
ABS
-
Parking Brakes
-
Body Option & Cabin Type
Chassis Type
Heavy Duty Chassis
Chassis with Cabin
Chassis with Cabin
-
Body Option
Deck Body
Deck Body
Deck Body
-
Cabin Type
Day Cabin
Day Cabin
Day Cabin
-
Tiltable Cabin
-
Tyres
Number of Tyre
3
3
3
-
Rear Tyre
3.00 x 10
3.75 x 12
90/90-12
-
Front Tyre
3.00 x 10
3.75 x 12
90/90-12
-
Others
Chassis
-
Battery(Volts)
12 V
48 V
48 V
-
Fog Lights
-
Loading Platform Area(Sq.ft)
-
-
6-8
-
Alternator (Amps)
-
-
15
-
Other Details
Charging Time
7-8 Hours
8 Hours
7-8 Hours
8-12 Hours
Type Of Motor
BLDC Motor
DC Brush Less
BLDC Motor
1200 W Differential DC motor
Rating
4.5
4.7
4.7
4.8
Usecase
Bulk cargo movement
logistics
Intercity transport of goods
-

Which to buy

Which One Fits Your Use Case?

FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Avon E-CARGO vs JSA E Cart vs E-Ranger Loader vs Etron Midbin 1960/Electric?

+
JSA E Cart has the lower price among these options.

Which has better payload, Avon E-CARGO vs JSA E Cart vs E-Ranger Loader vs Etron Midbin 1960/Electric?

+
Etron Midbin 1960/Electric has the better payload at 800 kg.

Which has better GVW, Avon E-CARGO vs JSA E Cart vs E-Ranger Loader vs Etron Midbin 1960/Electric?

+
E-Ranger Loader has the better GVW at 729 kg.

Which truck should I choose between Avon E-CARGO and JSA E Cart?

+
Choose Avon E-CARGO if its price, body type, fuel type, and payload fit your route and loading needs better. Choose JSA E Cart if its specifications, service fit, or operating cost suits your business use case more closely.

What fuel types are available in Avon E-CARGO vs JSA E Cart vs E-Ranger Loader vs Etron Midbin 1960/Electric?

+
Avon E-CARGO vs JSA E Cart vs E-Ranger Loader vs Etron Midbin 1960/Electric include Electric fuel option. Buyers should compare fuel availability, route distance, and daily running cost before finalizing a truck.

What body types are compared in Avon E-CARGO vs JSA E Cart vs E-Ranger Loader vs Etron Midbin 1960/Electric?

+
This comparison includes 3 Wheeler body type. Match the body type with your cargo, loading pattern, and city or highway route requirement.

How do tyre configurations compare in Avon E-CARGO vs JSA E Cart vs E-Ranger Loader vs Etron Midbin 1960/Electric?

+
Avon E-CARGO has 3 tyres, JSA E Cart has 3 tyres, E-Ranger Loader has 3 tyres, Etron Midbin 1960/Electric has 3 tyres. Tyre configuration matters for load stability, operating conditions, and maintenance planning.