Truck Comparison
E-Maggic M.S vs E-Ranger Loader: Price & Specs Comparison
E-Maggic M.S is the more affordable option here by about ₹12,000. E-Ranger Loader leads on mileage at 100 km/l. The compared trucks cover E Rickshaw, 3 Wheeler body types with Electric fuel option.
This comparison uses the available truck data for E-Maggic M.S vs E-Ranger Loader so you can check which model fits better for your budget, route, payload requirement, fuel preference, and daily business usage.
Body types: E Rickshaw, 3 Wheeler. Fuel option: Electric. Tyres: 3. Payload: E-Maggic M.S: NA | E-Ranger Loader: 310 Kgs.
Review all available price, mileage, power, torque, GVW, body type, tyres, gearbox, chassis, and extra specification details below before shortlisting a model.
Compare
Add Trucks to Compare
Details
Full Truck Details
Key Specifications16 specs
Price
₹1.30 L
₹1.42 L
Brand
e-maggic
e-ranger
Model
E-Maggic M.S
E-Ranger Loader
Body Type
E Rickshaw
3 Wheeler
Engine
NA
NA
Power
1 hp
1 hp
Max Torque
NA
NA
Mileage
80 KM
100 KM
Gross Vehicle Weight
800 kg
729 kg
Payload
NA
310 Kgs
No. of Tyres
3
3
Fuel Type
Electric
Electric
Fuel Tank Capacity
3.84kWh
130 kWh
Max Speed
25 km/h
20.8 km/h
Gear Box
1 Forward + 1 Reverse
1 Forward + 1 Reverse
Chassis Type
Chassis with Cabin
Chassis with Cabin
Performance12 specs
Max Power
1 hp
1 hp
Fuel Type
Electric
Electric
Max Speed (km/h)
25
20.8
Range
80
100
Battery Capacity
3.84kWh
130 kWh
Type of Motor
BLDC Motor
BLDC Motor
Motor Capacity
1200 W
-
Carrier Type
Passenger Carrier
Goods Carrier
Product Type
L3M (Low Speed Passenger Carrier)
L3N (Low Speed Goods Carrier)
Emission Norms
-
Zero Tailpipe
Gradeability (%)
-
7 %
Turning Radius (mm)
-
6000
Charging1 specs
Charging Time
6-8 Hours
7-8 Hours
Dimension9 specs
Overall Length (mm)
2782
2797
Overall Width (mm)
995
980
Overall Height (mm)
1775
1330
Ground Clearance (mm)
160
325
Wheelbase (mm)
2170
1800
Axle Configuration
3x3
3x3
Loading Length {mm}
-
1400
Loading Width {mm}
-
970
Loading Height {mm}
-
510
Transmission & Loading Capacity6 specs
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
GVW / GCW (Kgs)
800 kg
729 kg
Kerb Weight (Kgs)
337
310
Gear Box
1 Forward + 1 Reverse
1 Forward + 1 Reverse
Power Steering
Payload (Kgs)
-
310 Kgs
Features14 specs
Steering
Handle bar type
Handle bar type
A/C
Cruise Control
Navigation System
Telematics
Tiltable Steering
Arm-rest
Seat Type
Standard
Standard
Driver Information Display
Adjustable Driver Seat
Seating Capacity
D+4 Passenger
Driver Only
Seat Belts
Hill Hold
Tubeless Tyres
-
Brakes & Suspension5 specs
Brakes
Mechanical Drum Brakes
Drum Type
Front Suspension
43 mm Diameter Hydraulic Shocker
Hydraulic Shocker
Rear Suspension
8.5 Hydraulic
Leaf Spring
ABS
Parking Brakes
Body Option & Cabin Type4 specs
Chassis Type
Chassis with Cabin
Chassis with Cabin
Body Option
Fully Built
Deck Body
Cabin Type
Day Cabin
Day Cabin
Tiltable Cabin
Tyres3 specs
Number of Tyre
3
3
Rear Tyre
90x90x12 (3.75x12)
90/90-12
Front Tyre
90x90x12 (3.75x12)
90/90-12
Others5 specs
Chassis
Battery(Volts)
48 V
48 V
Fog Lights
Loading Platform Area(Sq.ft)
-
6-8
Alternator (Amps)
-
15
Other Details4 specs
Charging Time
6-8 Hours
7-8 Hours
Type Of Motor
BLDC Motor
BLDC Motor
Rating
4.7
4.7
Usecase
Intercity transport of goods
Intercity transport of goods
Which to buy
Which One Fits Your Use Case?
FAQs
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, E-Maggic M.S vs E-Ranger Loader?
+−
E-Maggic M.S has the lower price among these options.
Which has better mileage, E-Maggic M.S vs E-Ranger Loader?
+−
E-Ranger Loader has the better mileage at 100 km/l.
Which has better GVW, E-Maggic M.S vs E-Ranger Loader?
+−
E-Maggic M.S has the better GVW at 800 kg.
Which truck should I choose between E-Maggic M.S and E-Ranger Loader?
+−
Choose E-Maggic M.S if its price, body type, fuel type, and payload fit your route and loading needs better. Choose E-Ranger Loader if its specifications, service fit, or operating cost suits your business use case more closely.
What fuel types are available in E-Maggic M.S vs E-Ranger Loader?
+−
E-Maggic M.S vs E-Ranger Loader include Electric fuel option. Buyers should compare fuel availability, route distance, and daily running cost before finalizing a truck.
What body types are compared in E-Maggic M.S vs E-Ranger Loader?
+−
This comparison includes E Rickshaw, 3 Wheeler body types. Match the body type with your cargo, loading pattern, and city or highway route requirement.
How do tyre configurations compare in E-Maggic M.S vs E-Ranger Loader?
+−
E-Maggic M.S has 3 tyres, E-Ranger Loader has 3 tyres. Tyre configuration matters for load stability, operating conditions, and maintenance planning.