Truck Comparison

Ashok Leyland Bada Dost CNG vs Tata Intra EV vs EKA K1.5 vs EKA K1.5 2900/Eutectic Van: Price & Specs Comparison

Ashok Leyland Bada Dost CNG is the more affordable option here by about ₹27,000. Tata Intra EV leads on payload at 1750 kg. The compared trucks cover Mini Trucks body type with CNG, Electric fuel options.

This comparison uses the available truck data for Ashok Leyland Bada Dost CNG vs Tata Intra EV vs EKA K1.5 vs EKA K1.5 2900/Eutectic Van so you can check which model fits better for your budget, route, payload requirement, fuel preference, and daily business usage.

Body type: Mini Trucks. Fuel options: CNG, Electric. Tyres: 4. Payload: Ashok Leyland Bada Dost CNG: 1246 Kgs | Tata Intra EV: 1750 Kgs | EKA K1.5: 1300 Kgs | EKA K1.5 2900/Eutectic Van: 1300 Kgs.

Review all available price, mileage, power, torque, GVW, body type, tyres, gearbox, chassis, and extra specification details below before shortlisting a model.

Compare

Add Trucks to Compare

Details

Full Truck Details

Specs
This TruckAshok Leyland Bada Dost CNG

₹10.73 L

Tata Intra EV

₹11.95 L

EKA K1.5

₹11.00 L

Key Specifications
Price
₹10.73 L
₹11.95 L
₹11.00 L
₹11.00 L
Brand
ashok-leyland
tata
eka
eka
Model
Ashok Leyland Bada Dost CNG
Tata Intra EV
EKA K1.5
EKA K1.5 2900/Eutectic Van
Body Type
Mini Trucks
Mini Trucks
Mini Trucks
Mini Trucks
Engine
1478 cc
NA
NA
NA
Power
58 Hp
97 hp
80 hp
80 hp
Max Torque
160 Nm
NA
220 Nm
220 Nm
Mileage
13 - 15 kmpl
200 Km/Full Charge
180 Km/full charge
180 Km/full charge
Gross Vehicle Weight
2880 kg
3310 kg
2510 kg
2510 kg
Payload
1246 Kgs
1750 Kgs
1300 Kgs
1300 Kgs
No. of Tyres
4
4
4
4
Fuel Type
CNG
Electric
Electric
Electric
Fuel Tank Capacity
148 Ltr
28.2 kWh
32 Kwh
32 Kwh
Max Speed
80 Km/h
80 Km/h
70 km/h
70
Gear Box
Fully synchronized 5 speed manual gearbox and reverse with constant mesh
1 Forward + 1 Reverse
1 Forward + 1 Reverse
1 Forward + 1 Reverse
Chassis Type
Chassis with Cabin
Chassis with Cabin
Ladder Frame
Ladder Frame
Performance
Max Power
58 Hp
97 hp
80 hp
80 hp
Engine Displacement (cc)
1478 cc
-
-
-
Fuel Tank (Litres)
148 Ltr
-
-
-
Engine
1.5 L,3 Cylinder Cng (BS VI) With turbocharger
-
-
-
Fuel Type
CNG
Electric
Electric
Electric
Emission Norms
BS-VI
-
Zero Tailpipe
Zero Tailpipe
Max Torque
160 Nm
230 Nm
220 Nm
220 Nm
Mileage
13-15 kmpl
-
-
-
Gradeability (%)
28 %
23 %
18 %
18 %
Max Speed (km/h)
80
80
70
70
Engine Cylinders
3
-
-
-
Turning Radius (mm)
11000
6000
-
-
Carrier Type
Goods Carrier
Goods Carrier
Goods Carrier
Goods Carrier
Product Type
L3N (Low Speed Goods Carrier)
L5N (High Speed Goods Carrier)
L5N (High Speed Goods Carrier)
L5N (High Speed Goods Carrier)
Range
-
211
180
180
Battery Capacity
-
28.2 kWh
32 Kwh
32 Kwh
Type of Motor
-
-
PMS Motor
PMS Motor
Dimension
Overall Length (mm)
4868
4734/4745
4610
2630
Overall Width (mm)
1842
1750
1600
1600
Overall Height (mm)
2056
2010
1850
470
Ground Clearance (mm)
195
185
200
200
Wheelbase (mm)
2510
2600
2900
2900
Axle Configuration
4x2
-
4x2
4x2
Loading Length {mm}
2745
2960
-
-
Loading Width {mm}
1750
1750
-
-
Loading Height {mm}
440
460
-
-
Transmission & Loading Capacity
Transmission
Manual
Automatic
Automatic
Automatic
Payload (Kgs)
1246 Kgs
1750 Kgs
1300 Kgs
1300 Kgs
GVW / GCW (Kgs)
2880 kg
3310 kg
2510 kg
2510 kg
Kerb Weight (Kgs)
1634
1560
1840
1840
Gear Box
Fully synchronized 5 speed manual gearbox and reverse with constant mesh
Automatic with e-Axle
1 Forward + 1 Reverse
1 Forward + 1 Reverse
Clutch
Diaghram, Singal dry Plate, Machanical Cable With Operated
-
-
-
Power Steering
Features
Steering
Power Steering
EPAS (Electric Power Assisted Steering)
Rack & Pinion Type, Electrically Assisted
Rack & Pinion Type, Electrically Assisted
A/C
-
Cruise Control
-
Navigation System
-
Telematics
Tiltable Steering
-
Arm-rest
-
Seat Type
Standard
Standard
Standard
Standard
Driver Information Display
Adjustable Driver Seat
-
Seating Capacity
D+2
D+1
D+1
D+1
Tubeless Tyres
-
Seat Belts
Hill Hold
-
Brakes & Suspension
Brakes
Vacuum Assisted Hydrulic breaks With 10'' booster Ventilated Disc & Drum
Disc & Drum Brakes
Disc & Drum Brakes
Disc & Drum Brakes
Front Suspension
RFS Rigid Suspension with parabolic leaf and double acting shock absorber
Rigid Suspension with parabolic leaf spring
MCPherson Independent Suspension
MCPherson Independent Suspension
Rear Suspension
RFS Rigid Suspension with parabolic leaf and double acting shock absorber
Rigid Suspension with parabolic leaf spring
Longitudinal Leaf Spring Suspension
Longitudinal Leaf Spring Suspension
ABS
-
Parking Brakes
-
Body Option & Cabin Type
Chassis Type
Chassis with Cabin
Chassis with Cabin
Ladder Frame
Ladder Frame
Body Option
Deck Body
Deck Body
Box body
Deck Body
Cabin Type
Day Cabin
Day Cabin
Day Cabin
Day Cabin
Tiltable Cabin
-
Tyres
Number of Tyre
4
4
4
4
Rear Tyre
215/75R 15LT, Radial
215/75 R15
175 R14 LT
175 R14 LT
Front Tyre
215/75R 15LT, Radial
215/75 R15
175 R14 LT
175 R14 LT
Others
Chassis
Fog Lights
Battery(Volts)
-
-
48 V
48 V
Charging
Charging Time
-
50 Min
6-8 Hours
6-8 Hours
Other Details
Charging Time
No
55 minutes
6-8 Hours
6-8 Hours
Type Of Motor
No
Lithium Iron Phosphate (LFP)
PMS Motor
PMS Motor
Rating
4.5
-
-
-
Usecase
Last-mile delivery, Small business logistics, Agriculture
Last-mile delivery, Small business logistics
Last-mile delivery, Small business logistics
Last-mile delivery, Small business logistics, Agriculture

Which to buy

Which One Fits Your Use Case?

FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Ashok Leyland Bada Dost CNG vs Tata Intra EV vs EKA K1.5 vs EKA K1.5 2900/Eutectic Van?

+
Ashok Leyland Bada Dost CNG has the lower price among these options.

Which has better power, Ashok Leyland Bada Dost CNG vs Tata Intra EV vs EKA K1.5 vs EKA K1.5 2900/Eutectic Van?

+
Tata Intra EV has the better power at 97 HP.

Which has better mileage, Ashok Leyland Bada Dost CNG vs Tata Intra EV vs EKA K1.5 vs EKA K1.5 2900/Eutectic Van?

+
Tata Intra EV has the better mileage at 200 km/l.

Which has better payload, Ashok Leyland Bada Dost CNG vs Tata Intra EV vs EKA K1.5 vs EKA K1.5 2900/Eutectic Van?

+
Tata Intra EV has the better payload at 1750 kg.

Which has better GVW, Ashok Leyland Bada Dost CNG vs Tata Intra EV vs EKA K1.5 vs EKA K1.5 2900/Eutectic Van?

+
Tata Intra EV has the better GVW at 3310 kg.

Which truck should I choose between Ashok Leyland Bada Dost CNG and Tata Intra EV?

+
Choose Ashok Leyland Bada Dost CNG if its price, body type, fuel type, and payload fit your route and loading needs better. Choose Tata Intra EV if its specifications, service fit, or operating cost suits your business use case more closely.

What fuel types are available in Ashok Leyland Bada Dost CNG vs Tata Intra EV vs EKA K1.5 vs EKA K1.5 2900/Eutectic Van?

+
Ashok Leyland Bada Dost CNG vs Tata Intra EV vs EKA K1.5 vs EKA K1.5 2900/Eutectic Van include CNG, Electric fuel options. Buyers should compare fuel availability, route distance, and daily running cost before finalizing a truck.

What body types are compared in Ashok Leyland Bada Dost CNG vs Tata Intra EV vs EKA K1.5 vs EKA K1.5 2900/Eutectic Van?

+
This comparison includes Mini Trucks body type. Match the body type with your cargo, loading pattern, and city or highway route requirement.

How do tyre configurations compare in Ashok Leyland Bada Dost CNG vs Tata Intra EV vs EKA K1.5 vs EKA K1.5 2900/Eutectic Van?

+
Ashok Leyland Bada Dost CNG has 4 tyres, Tata Intra EV has 4 tyres, EKA K1.5 has 4 tyres, EKA K1.5 2900/Eutectic Van has 4 tyres. Tyre configuration matters for load stability, operating conditions, and maintenance planning.

Comparison List