Truck Comparison

Ashok Leyland Saathi vs OSM M1KA 1.0 vs Tata ACE CNG 2.0(Bi-Fuel) vs Tata Ace gold 2100/Diesel: Price & Specs Comparison

Tata ACE CNG 2.0(Bi-Fuel) is the more affordable option here by about ₹4,000. OSM M1KA 1.0 leads on mileage at 150 km/l. The compared trucks cover Mini Trucks body type with Diesel, Electric, CNG fuel options.

This comparison uses the available truck data for Ashok Leyland Saathi vs OSM M1KA 1.0 vs Tata ACE CNG 2.0(Bi-Fuel) vs Tata Ace gold 2100/Diesel so you can check which model fits better for your budget, route, payload requirement, fuel preference, and daily business usage.

Body type: Mini Trucks. Fuel options: Diesel, Electric, CNG. Tyres: 4. Payload: Ashok Leyland Saathi: 1120 Kgs | OSM M1KA 1.0: 1000 Kgs | Tata ACE CNG 2.0(Bi-Fuel): 800 Kgs | Tata Ace gold 2100/Diesel: 900 Kgs.

Review all available price, mileage, power, torque, GVW, body type, tyres, gearbox, chassis, and extra specification details below before shortlisting a model.

Compare

Add Trucks to Compare

Details

Full Truck Details

Specs
This TruckAshok Leyland Saathi

₹6.54 L

OSM M1KA 1.0

₹6.99 L

Tata Ace gold 2100/Diesel

₹4.50 L - ₹6.69 L

Key Specifications
Price
₹6.54 L
₹6.99 L
₹6.50 L
₹4.50 L - ₹6.69 L
Brand
tata
osm
tata
tata
Model
Ashok Leyland Saathi
OSM M1KA 1.0
Tata ACE CNG 2.0(Bi-Fuel)
Tata Ace gold 2100/Diesel
Body Type
Mini Trucks
Mini Trucks
Mini Trucks
Mini Trucks
Engine
1478
NA
694
700 cc
Power
45 hp
60 hp
18.3 kW
16.17 kW
Max Torque
110 Nm
80 Nm
50 Nm
55 Nm
Mileage
20 kmpl
150
21-24 kmpl
22 kmpl
Gross Vehicle Weight
2288 kg
2620 kg
1790 kg
1835 kg
Payload
1120 Kgs
1000 Kgs
800 Kgs
900 Kgs
No. of Tyres
4
4
4
4
Fuel Type
Diesel
Electric
CNG
Diesel
Fuel Tank Capacity
40
38.7 kWh
70
30 Ltr
Max Speed
80
50 Km/h
70
65Km/h
Gear Box
5F + 1R Manual Gearbox
1 Forward + 1 Reverse
GBS 65- 5/6.31
GBS G65-5/6.31
Chassis Type
Chassis with Cabin
Chassis with Cabin
Chassis with Cabin
Chassis with Cabin
Performance
Max Power
45 hp
60 hp
-
16.17 kW
Engine Displacement (cc)
1478 cc
-
-
700 cc
Fuel Tank (Litres)
40 Ltr
-
-
30 Ltr
Engine
1.5 Liters, 3 Cylinder Diesel Engine Turbo Charged Intercooler
-
-
4 Stroke, Turbocharged InterCooled, Direct Injection Common Rail Diesel engine
Fuel Type
Diesel
Electric
-
Diesel
Emission Norms
BS-VI
Zero Tailpipe
-
BS-VI
Max Torque
110 Nm
80 Nm
-
55 Nm
Mileage
20 kmpl
-
-
22 kmpl
Max Speed (km/h)
80
80
-
65
Engine Cylinders
3
-
-
2
Engine Displacement (cm3)
1478
-
-
-
Gradeability (%)
-
20 %
-
35 %
Range
-
150
-
-
Battery Capacity
-
38.7 kWh
-
46 Ah
Type of Motor
-
Water Cooling
-
-
Product Type
-
L3N (Low Speed Goods Carrier)
-
L3N (Low Speed Goods Carrier)
Carrier Type
-
Goods Carrier
-
Goods Carrier
Mileage City
-
-
-
18-20
Mileage Highway
-
-
-
20-22
Turning Radius (mm)
-
-
-
4300
Dimension
Overall Length (mm)
4406
4730
-
3800
Overall Width (mm)
1663
1670
-
1500
Overall Height (mm)
1833
1960
-
1845
Wheelbase (mm)
2250
3050
-
2100
Loading Length {mm}
2500
-
-
2200
Loading Width {mm}
1620
-
-
1490
Loading Height {mm}
380
-
-
300
Ground Clearance (mm)
-
313
-
160
Axle Configuration
-
4x2
-
4x2
Transmission & Loading Capacity
Transmission
Manual
Automatic
-
Manual
Payload (Kgs)
1120 Kgs
1000 Kgs
-
900 Kgs
GVW / GCW (Kgs)
2288 kg
2620 kg
-
1835 kg
Gear Box
5F + 1R Manual Gearbox
1 Forward + 1 Reverse
-
GBS G65-5/6.31
Clutch
215 mm Dia, Dry Type / Single plate / Mechanical Actuation
-
-
Single-plate, dry-friction diaphragm type
Kerb Weight (Kgs)
-
1320
-
920
Power Steering
-
-
Features
Cruise Control
-
Navigation System
-
Arm-rest
-
Seat Type
Standard
Standard
-
Standard
Driver Information Display
-
Adjustable Driver Seat
-
Seating Capacity
D+1
D+1
-
D+1
Seat Belts
-
Hill Hold
-
Steering
-
Electric Power Steering
-
Manual Steering
A/C
-
-
Telematics
-
-
Tubeless Tyres
-
-
Tiltable Steering
-
-
-
Brakes & Suspension
Brakes
Vaccum Assisted Hydraulic Brake with LSPV Disc & Drum Type
Front Disc and Rear Drum
-
Disc & Drum Brakes
Front Suspension
Parabolic Leaf Spring (2L) with Double Acting Shock Absorber
MacPherson Independent Suspension
-
Rigid Axle with Parabolic Leaf Spring
Rear Suspension
Parabolic Leaf Spring (3L) with Double Acting Shock Absorber
Non- independent 6-leaf-spring top mounted suspension
-
Live Axle with Semi-Elliptical leaf spring
ABS
-
Parking Brakes
-
Front Axle
-
-
-
Rigid front axle with parabolic leaf springs
Rear Axle
-
-
-
Live axle
Body Option & Cabin Type
Chassis Type
Chassis with Cabin
Chassis with Cabin
-
Chassis with Cabin
Body Option
Deck Body
Deck Body
-
Deck Body
Cabin Type
Day Cabin
Day Cabin
-
Day Cabin
Tiltable Cabin
-
Tyres
Number of Tyre
4
4
-
4
Rear Tyre
165 R14 LR, 8PR
185R14LT8PR
-
145 R12 LT 8PR, Radial
Front Tyre
165 R14 LR, 8PR
185R14LT8PR
-
145 R12 LT 8PR, Radial
Others
Chassis
-
Fog Lights
-
Battery(Volts)
-
48 V
-
12 V
Other Details
Usecase
Last-mile delivery, Small business logistics
Small business logistics, Last-mile delivery
Small business logistics, Last-mile delivery
Agriculture
Charging Time
-
15 min / 2 hours / 30 min
-
No
Type Of Motor
-
Water Cooling
-
No
Rating
-
4.5
-
4.5

Which to buy

Which One Fits Your Use Case?

FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Ashok Leyland Saathi vs OSM M1KA 1.0 vs Tata ACE CNG 2.0(Bi-Fuel) vs Tata Ace gold 2100/Diesel?

+
Tata ACE CNG 2.0(Bi-Fuel) has the lower price among these options.

Which has better power, Ashok Leyland Saathi vs OSM M1KA 1.0 vs Tata ACE CNG 2.0(Bi-Fuel) vs Tata Ace gold 2100/Diesel?

+
OSM M1KA 1.0 has the better power at 60 HP.

Which has better torque, Ashok Leyland Saathi vs OSM M1KA 1.0 vs Tata ACE CNG 2.0(Bi-Fuel) vs Tata Ace gold 2100/Diesel?

+
Ashok Leyland Saathi has the better torque at 110.

Which has better mileage, Ashok Leyland Saathi vs OSM M1KA 1.0 vs Tata ACE CNG 2.0(Bi-Fuel) vs Tata Ace gold 2100/Diesel?

+
OSM M1KA 1.0 has the better mileage at 150 km/l.

Which has better payload, Ashok Leyland Saathi vs OSM M1KA 1.0 vs Tata ACE CNG 2.0(Bi-Fuel) vs Tata Ace gold 2100/Diesel?

+
Ashok Leyland Saathi has the better payload at 1120 kg.

Which has better GVW, Ashok Leyland Saathi vs OSM M1KA 1.0 vs Tata ACE CNG 2.0(Bi-Fuel) vs Tata Ace gold 2100/Diesel?

+
OSM M1KA 1.0 has the better GVW at 2620 kg.

Which truck should I choose between Ashok Leyland Saathi and OSM M1KA 1.0?

+
Choose Ashok Leyland Saathi if its price, body type, fuel type, and payload fit your route and loading needs better. Choose OSM M1KA 1.0 if its specifications, service fit, or operating cost suits your business use case more closely.

What fuel types are available in Ashok Leyland Saathi vs OSM M1KA 1.0 vs Tata ACE CNG 2.0(Bi-Fuel) vs Tata Ace gold 2100/Diesel?

+
Ashok Leyland Saathi vs OSM M1KA 1.0 vs Tata ACE CNG 2.0(Bi-Fuel) vs Tata Ace gold 2100/Diesel include Diesel, Electric, CNG fuel options. Buyers should compare fuel availability, route distance, and daily running cost before finalizing a truck.

What body types are compared in Ashok Leyland Saathi vs OSM M1KA 1.0 vs Tata ACE CNG 2.0(Bi-Fuel) vs Tata Ace gold 2100/Diesel?

+
This comparison includes Mini Trucks body type. Match the body type with your cargo, loading pattern, and city or highway route requirement.

How do tyre configurations compare in Ashok Leyland Saathi vs OSM M1KA 1.0 vs Tata ACE CNG 2.0(Bi-Fuel) vs Tata Ace gold 2100/Diesel?

+
Ashok Leyland Saathi has 4 tyres, OSM M1KA 1.0 has 4 tyres, Tata ACE CNG 2.0(Bi-Fuel) has 4 tyres, Tata Ace gold 2100/Diesel has 4 tyres. Tyre configuration matters for load stability, operating conditions, and maintenance planning.

Comparison List